- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Pension age
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Pension age"
Collapse
-
[victormeldrew mode]Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Postmillions of younger people who'll have to work a long time to subsidize baby boomers who've had plenty of opportunity during long growth periods to provide for themselves.
Utter tosh. The thing about the baby boomers is that most of them got off their spotty arses and made things happen for themselves. They went out and got jobs as soon as they were old enough. They saved for things they wanted rather than running up huge bills on instant credit, because back then there was nobody handing out easy loans and endless credit.
They have paid into the system all of their extensive working lives, money which has provided a pension for their parents' generation. The generation that won two world wars for us.
And now that they are approaching their retirement years they are having to not only support ageing parents in many cases, they are also having to wipe the backsides of brigades of feckless "want-it-all-now" generation children that struggle to stand on their own two feet.
Honestly, many of this younger mob really need to take a long hard look at themselves. They need to put a bit more effort into finding and staying in work, and a lot less effort into endlessly bitching on about notional freebies they somehow seem to feel they should be entitled to for no obvious fooking reason!!!
Someone needs to explain to them they are not "entitled" to own a house just because they would like to own one.
[/victormeldrew mode]
Leave a comment:
-
I quite agree.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI am 39. I don't believe there'll be any money to pay me a state pension if Europe's governments carry on prevaricating. That simply can't be fair.
Leave a comment:
-
Seems to me that if you can afford to retire early on your own savings then there's nothing to stop you anyway, and if you can't afford to retire on your own savings then you're probably going to want to keep working for as long as possible anyway, for both financial and sanity reasons. Can't be much fun to retire at 60 with nothing but a basic state pension stretching out for years ahead of you.
Leave a comment:
-
Typical bloody govermin though. It's not their fault for running a ponzi scheme, oh no,
it's all caused by oldies, all their fault for growing old.
What's next, state sponsored Granny bashing?
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, bloody economic migrant and all that.Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostServes you right. Over there milking the European Job market.

Leave a comment:
-
I am 39. I don't believe there'll be any money to pay me a state pension if Europe's governments carry on prevaricating. That simply can't be fair.Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostIt is a serious issue. Mrs Bloggs is 50. Her state retirement age has gone from 60 to 67! That simply cannot be fair.
Leave a comment:
-
It is a serious issue. Mrs Bloggs is 50. Her state retirement age has gone from 60 to 67! That simply cannot be fair.
Leave a comment:
-
Yep, precisely. The longer it's delayed the longer people will have to work, and the more revenues (tax and NI) the government will need from everyone.Originally posted by vetran View PostHave the balls to say, its going up, sorry but we should of done this decades ago, but we have to do it now!
Leave a comment:
-
moan moan, its not fair I will lose some pension because I'm a woman! why don't you blokes complain, oh yes you have spent the last 30 years waiting 5 years longer you are used to it.
C.M.D.
Have the balls to say, its going up, sorry but we should of done this decades ago, but we have to do it now!
Leave a comment:
-
Gives a few more of 'em chance to "pop off" before they can claim their pension though, don't itOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMore political whining, procrastination and prevaricating about pension age here, talking about it rising to 67 or 66 in umpteen years time. Personally I think that the best way to do this is to say 'right then, as of tomorrow morning, pension age rises by 6 months'. It would start saving large amounts of money right now, and would not be so unfair to millions of younger people who'll have to work a long time to subsidize baby boomers who've had plenty of opportunity during long growth periods to provide for themselves.
BBC News - Ministers delay state pension rise to 66 to help women
Leave a comment:
-
Pension age
More political whining, procrastination and prevaricating about pension age here, talking about it rising to 67 or 66 in umpteen years time. Personally I think that the best way to do this is to say 'right then, as of tomorrow morning, pension age rises by 6 months'. It would start saving large amounts of money right now, and would not be so unfair to millions of younger people who'll have to work a long time to subsidize baby boomers who've had plenty of opportunity during long growth periods to provide for themselves.
BBC News - Ministers delay state pension rise to 66 to help womenTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Today 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Yesterday 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41

Leave a comment: