• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "£12bn NHS computer system is scrapped..."

Collapse

  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    The problem as I see it from various viewpoints over the last 8 years lies in the contracts, which are so tied down that clinical and other operatoinal priorities are ignored. Some of these are dynamic and require a more dynamic contractual arrangement, but some of them are blindingly obvious. The silver bullet, IMHO, for hospitals would be electronic prescribing of medication with an electronic drug administration record. The potential benefits in terms of patient safety and other clinical outcomes would be significant, and it would engage clinical staff. It would also pave the way for a patient centred drug record taking into account GP prescription records, pharmacy dispensing records, Mental Health and Community medication records.

    There were lots of other relatively simple 'early wins' such as electronic discharge summaries, so that GPs and community teams actually know when a patient has come out of the hospital.

    Instead, there has been this insane collection of complex and therefore undeliverable nonsense that deosn't even meet the right priorities.
    You do sound like someone on the inside.

    This could open up opportunities for a guy like me, who has a EMR solution which is being test deployed in South Africa. Well its worth a shot, but given the addiction to the big five consultancies...it may not happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Most of them were too busy getting new contracts over the first 5 years of the labour goverment to care about anything. Labour (and the country) got totally fecked over by making an arse up of the negotiations. The BMA were hiring out football grounds for the meetings and normally mild mannered doctors in tweed jackets were standing up on seats shouting how they were going to go on strike. They are the most militant workforce in the country just now.
    I think the teachers are more militant as the doctors are happy with their pay even if they don't like the systems they are using.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The solution would have been to ask the doctors what they wanted. I gather they resisted this software monolith and Hewitt & co. gravy train from the onset and ended up writing their own crappy Excel based solutions, which then also had to be corrected and maintained by the IT departments. Although it's probably also true that they are more touchy feely than technically inclined.
    Most of them were too busy getting new contracts over the first 5 years of the labour goverment to care about anything. Labour (and the country) got totally fecked over by making an arse up of the negotiations. The BMA were hiring out football grounds for the meetings and normally mild mannered doctors in tweed jackets were standing up on seats shouting how they were going to go on strike. They are the most militant workforce in the country just now.

    Leave a comment:


  • psychocandy
    replied
    Wonder if this is a worse screw up than yesterdays Firecon ?

    Leave a comment:


  • lukemg
    replied
    Still sounds like a big chunk of cash no matter how you look at it. Having said that, the money has at least gone to people in the UK, been recycled into the economy and taxes and there has been some stuff to show for it.
    Sounds like the next phase is screaming for a cloud solution to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by centurian View Post
    Dubious - it might work according to the agreed specification with the vendors - which is largely written by the vendors who bamboozle the incompetant NHS staff into agreeing that the reams of documentation "being delivered" actually amounts to something.

    But does it mean that doctors, nurses and patients can actually do anything useful with it - or was it worth the staggeringly humungeous cost.
    Nope. They actually work.

    NHSMail. Secure encrypted email service available to every NHS employee to allow confidential exchange of paitient information between hospitals, gps and other health services.

    N3. A private, national WAN with over 40,000 endpoints providing private managed comms between connected organisations.

    PACS. Digital storage and display of X-Rays, Cat Scans and other medical imaging available online via N3 and capturing millions of images a week.

    EPS. Connecting thousands of Pharmacies to GP's and hospitals and allowing prescriptions to be sent directly to the Pharmacy for collection by the patient.

    SCR. Summary health records of millions of individuals allowing access to basic medical details anywhere in the NHS for use in emergancy situations.

    Choose and Book. Book hospital appontments from the GP surgery while the patient is there rather than waiting for letters and appointments to be sent back and forth.

    All these are supported by one of the largest IAM systems in the world with over a million users getting controlled access to NHS systems.

    These are live, in use in the NHS now, and they work.

    As I said, I'm not claiming the whole NPfIT project has been a resounding success, but there have a been a lot of good things come out of it and more continue to be developed.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Didn't Hewitt get a board seat from BT - presumably as a thank you from BT for granting them a big hunk of the NHS project.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    The solution would have been to ask the doctors what they wanted. I gather they resisted this software monolith and Hewitt & co. gravy train from the onset and ended up writing their own crappy Excel based solutions, which then also had to be corrected and maintained by the IT departments. Although it's probably also true that they are more touchy feely than technically inclined.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    The problem as I see it from various viewpoints over the last 8 years lies in the contracts, which are so tied down that clinical and other operatoinal priorities are ignored. Some of these are dynamic and require a more dynamic contractual arrangement, but some of them are blindingly obvious. The silver bullet, IMHO, for hospitals would be electronic prescribing of medication with an electronic drug administration record. The potential benefits in terms of patient safety and other clinical outcomes would be significant, and it would engage clinical staff. It would also pave the way for a patient centred drug record taking into account GP prescription records, pharmacy dispensing records, Mental Health and Community medication records.

    There were lots of other relatively simple 'early wins' such as electronic discharge summaries, so that GPs and community teams actually know when a patient has come out of the hospital.

    Instead, there has been this insane collection of complex and therefore undeliverable nonsense that deosn't even meet the right priorities.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Just had a read of the actual article. Every project they have quoted has actually been delivered and works.
    Dubious - it might work according to the agreed specification with the vendors - which is largely written by the vendors who bamboozle the incompetant NHS staff into agreeing that the reams of documentation "being delivered" actually amounts to something.

    But does it mean that doctors, nurses and patients can actually do anything useful with it - or was it worth the staggeringly humungeous cost.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Makes that £500m fire service thing look like a minor snafu.

    £12bn, and still my pregnant friends have to carry their notes around because the midwife and hospital and GP can't access their records on a central system...

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Yeah it's a nonsense article. The reporting lines are changing but the money has already been spent and at least some of the outputs delivered.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Punching Mordac in the kisser isn't exactly politics
    Stole my test network the bastard

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    I worked on SDS, a massive ldap solution, worked fine!!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Politics did for me in my only 2nd perm job at the time and the company in question paid me £10k to bugger off and open up my shop.
    Punching Mordac in the kisser isn't exactly politics

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X