Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Would the world be a better place after a flu pandemic?"
Africa is a large area with a broad variety of hazardous terrain and a long history of providing the backdrop for hunting expeditions. It's perfect for the job. In addition, large parts of it are unsuitable for cultivation or human habitation, being desert or subject to frequent droughts and suchlike, and it's climate has been responsible for untold human misery. If you are going to sacrifice a significant land mass then Africa is an obvious choice, and by relocating the surviving half of the existing population somewhere more human friendly we could ensure that no child will ever starve to death in the African sun again.
Bristol would struggle to hold the approx 3.5 billion people whom the aliens would be hunting. It's use would also require most of the "game" to travel considerably further, as assuming a fair per capita distribution of humans to be sacrificed most of them would be coming from S.E Asia. This might seem like a trivial point but these sort of considerations are important if you want the support of the global warming lobby.
Africa is a large area with a broad variety of hazardous terrain and a long history of providing the backdrop for hunting expeditions. It's perfect for the job. In addition, large parts of it are unsuitable for cultivation or human habitation, being desert or subject to frequent droughts and suchlike, and it's climate has been responsible for untold human misery. If you are going to sacrifice a significant land mass then Africa is an obvious choice, and by relocating the surviving half of the existing population somewhere more human friendly we could ensure that no child will ever starve to death in the African sun again.
Bristol would struggle to hold the approx 3.5 billion people whom the aliens would be hunting. It's use would also require most of the "game" to travel considerably further, as assuming a fair per capita distribution of humans to be sacrificed most of them would be coming from S.E Asia. This might seem like a trivial point but these sort of considerations are important if you want the support of the global warming lobby.
Bristol has caused more than its fair share of misery too. It was one of the points of the slave trade triangle...
Leave a comment: