Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Is this the end for the News of the World"
"The alleged deletion of emails will be of particular interest to the media regulator Ofcom, which said it had asked to be "kept abreast" of developments..."
Guardian are running with a story that a senior News International executive wiped all of their e-mails and archives - twice. Wonder if that's where the story still has legs
Apparently there are 'worse revelations to come'. Makes me wonder why they didn't cash in on the publicity by revealing all in their rag. It must be bad.
Worse revelations are yet to come and you will understand in a year why we closed News of the World', Rebekah Brooks tells angry staff (but STILL won't quit)
now they've got him for corruption, presumably relating to payments to police officers
Heard recently lawyers pay police for information relating to those areas of town were folks are less fortunate than ourselves have reported little accidenties (usually exaggerated to the power of infinity). The reports typically come from the same area town.
Daily/Sunday Mail had paid for 1,218 investigations to be undertaken by private investigators on behalf of up to 91 different journalists. The Daily/Sunday Mirror ordered 824 investigations on behalf of up to 70 journalists. The Sunday People ordered 802 investigations involving up to 50 journalists, and the News of the World (the paper of current interest) had ordered 228 transactions of up to 33 journalists.
On 3 November 2005, it was reported that Wade had been arrested following an alleged assault on her husband. She was later released without charge and the police took no further action.[27] The Sun had been running a campaign against domestic violence at the time.[5] From this point on, Wade was referred to in Private Eye as "the slapper" (a pejorative word for a woman of loose morals in Britain, and a pun on the act of slapping).
Him Oh absolutely, yeah. When I went freelance in 2004 the biggest payers - you'd have thought it would be the NoW, but actually it was the Daily Mail. If I take a good picture, the first person I go to is - such as in your case - the Mail on Sunday. Did you see that story? The picture of you, breaking down . . . I ought to thank you for that. I got £3,000. Whooo!
Me But would they [the Mail] buy a phone-hacked story?
Him For about four or five years they've absolutely been cleaner than clean. And before that they weren't. They were as dirty as anyone . . . They had the most money.
Leave a comment: