Originally posted by shaunbhoy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "UK nuclear support fades after Japan quake"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostYou might want to learn how to spell it then!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostKeep laughing.
The outcome of a risk assessment grounded a aircraft earlier this year that would have otherwise been allowed to continue flying until an in flight shut occurred.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cliphead View PostGod help yer clients
The outcome of a risk assessment grounded a aircraft earlier this year that would have otherwise been allowed to continue flying until an in flight shut down occurred.Last edited by scooterscot; 6 July 2011, 14:30.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cliphead View PostYou really don't have a clue do you?
I perform quantitive risk assessments for a living.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostWe've ran out of space we now need to build houses way up in the mountains?
Turns out Tsunami was not the only force of nature I was thinking of; what about man? What if a terrorist targeted a reactor with an explosive? Contamination could spread over a wide area. 5 reactors in the south of England, wait for the right wind conditions and London is a ghost town.
If it's made by man it is fallible. I don't know of any other MIP where the outcome can be so devastating.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostAnd hydro-electric means you lose the land straight away.
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostEven when the tulipe hits the fan on that scale, nobody is killed or seriously injured.
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostCan any other major industrial processes claim to be that safe?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostSo yes nuclear is the way to go - ask the French
And if their nukes blow, we'd get fallout anyway, with a favourable north westerly.
Leave a comment:
-
ahem
Coal power plants continually produce more radioactive waste than nuclear plants
Linky
And as we do not live on a fault line the chances of a disaster similar to Japan are pretty much 0
So yes nuclear is the way to go - ask the French
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostCouldn't agree more and those designs were >40 years old.
Good to see that the more level-headed posters are all drawing the same pragmatic conclusions. Now if we can just settle the panicky Sun-reading ones down somehow.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWhat would be the effect of a major accident at a coal fired power station? Would you be able to build houses and schools on the land afterwards?
And hydro-electric means you lose the land straight away.
Fukushima was hit by one of the biggest earthquakes on record, followed by a huge tsunami that devastated cities and killed 20,000 people, which in disaster stakes is as bad as it gets. And what happened? Nobody died, in fact none of the workers and certainly none of the public received any significant amount of radiation other than the two workers who had some minor burns from contaminated water.
Even when the tulipe hits the fan on that scale, nobody is killed or seriously injured. Can any other major industrial processes claim to be that safe? It's crazy that people are more scared of nuclear power after Fukushima; they should be reassured by what happened.
Leave a comment:
-
A massive radiation dose increases your risk of cancer by 10%, smoking increases your risk of lung cancer by 1000%.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: