• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Prevent global warming, burn more coal!"

Collapse

  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    Shame on those people ... I think it's a shame good scientists are ridiculed and the only ones that are supported and funded are ones that back flawed theories .....

    They're only ridiculed if they don't support the wider agenda.

    Is there true freedom of speech on the internet? Seems everything is still open to censorship or legal challenge if you dare say something that people with more power than you don't agree with.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
    Actually 7 out of the last 10 European winters were warmer than average. The snows last December seem to have been due to a shift in wind patterns, while it was cold here it was breaking warm temperature records in Canada. Amazing as it may seem, the IPCC are aware of the sun and its cycles, and it is a factor in the models. Unfortunately the cooling effect of a sun 'stuck' in a Maunder Minimum would be cancelled out by just 5 years worth of greenhouse gas emissions at current rates.

    After all the additional energy trapped in the atmosphere by manmade GHGs is equivalent to detonating 1 million Hiroshima bombs every single day.
    Gosh... have no fear we can rely on renewables to provide reliable power:

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
    Actually 7 out of the last 10 European winters were warmer than average. The snows last December seem to have been due to a shift in wind patterns, while it was cold here it was breaking warm temperature records in Canada. Amazing as it may seem, the IPCC are aware of the sun and its cycles, and it is a factor in the models. Unfortunately the cooling effect of a sun 'stuck' in a Maunder Minimum would be cancelled out by just 5 years worth of greenhouse gas emissions at current rates.

    After all the additional energy trapped in the atmosphere by manmade GHGs is equivalent to detonating 1 million Hiroshima bombs every single day.
    Gosh... have no fear, they're building modern renewable energy farms, problem sorted:

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Actually 7 out of the last 10 European winters were warmer than average. The snows last December seem to have been due to a shift in wind patterns, while it was cold here it was breaking warm temperature records in Canada. Amazing as it may seem, the IPCC are aware of the sun and its cycles, and it is a factor in the models. Unfortunately the cooling effect of a sun 'stuck' in a Maunder Minimum would be cancelled out by just 5 years worth of greenhouse gas emissions at current rates.

    After all the additional energy trapped in the atmosphere by manmade GHGs is equivalent to detonating 1 million Hiroshima bombs every single day.

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Never said it wasn't. Doesn't stop people from cashing in on it.
    Shame on those people ...

    I think it's a shame good scientists are ridiculed and the only ones that are supported and funded are ones that back flawed theories .....

    Leave a comment:


  • DiscoStu
    replied
    Constants in life:
    • The speed of light in a vacuum
    • The Newtonian constant of gravitation
    • The Planck constant
    • The Faraday constant
    • Another AGW thread on CUK

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Do current models take into account the low solar activity which could account for the recent cold winters? The Maunder minimum (about 1650–1700) was a prolonged episode of low solar activity which coincided with more severe winters in the United Kingdom and continental Europe.

    Can this be considered localised and transient or does it have a real effect on modelling and longer term predictions?

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Temps up about 0.2C

    pretty much as predicted by the models. But the trend is still too short to be very significant, you need to take an average of an ensemble of models over a longer period otherwise you get scribble:

    http://www.realclimate.org/images/model10.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    temperatures have not changed much for the last 14 years. So whatever the reason, soot, sulpher aerosols, volcanoes, other natural variability or whatever
    one thing is certain


    this was not predicted by the models



    the models have never hit the button. the IPCC is a fraud, climate science is a fraudulent science



    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    The usual .....

    WHAT! The short-term trend is all over the place?! You mean we still have weather? Well, I'll be ...

    Do let know when this trend gets reversed.



    Does CO2 always correlate with temperature (and if not, why not?)

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by wim121 View Post
    Pahhhhh CO2/manmade climate change is the biggest con of the past century .......

    Never said it wasn't. Doesn't stop people from cashing in on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    Pahhhhh CO2/manmade climate change is the biggest con of the past century .......

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Alternatively, shine a coloured light into the sky that has the effect of turning the blue sky to black. Just need a sun tracker and you can have a permanent sun shade.

    BTW, All these ideas I'm posting are patent pending. Send me a cheque and I'll cut you in for when the patent snafflers come along to buy them up for silly inflated prices.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    hmm....

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    started a topic Prevent global warming, burn more coal!

    Prevent global warming, burn more coal!

    Although burning the coal produced more warming carbon dioxide, it also put more tiny sulphate aerosol particles into the atmosphere which cool the planet by reflecting solar energy back into space.

Working...
X