Originally posted by OwlHoot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A Proposal for Improving CUK
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A Proposal for Improving CUK"
Collapse
-
I'd like to join in and be extremely nasty to posters to alleviate the dullness of testing, but frankly I am so bored today
meh.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostIt doesn't apply to Churchill, he screams so loud that everyone can hear him, even deaf people. It's like a little girl who's just discovered her favourite Barbie doll lying soiled atop her teenage brothers porn stash.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostIf and when it happens perhaps you'll find out.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostDidn't the ancient Greeks also have a system whereby if someone proposed a new law, and this was not accepted, then the proposer was put to death? (Very sound idea if you ask me.)
So if not everyone agrees to this ostracism proposal, then by your own logic you're for the chop.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo, if Churchill wets the bed in General and nobody cares, are the sheets wet?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
I would propose that each month, the two posters with the highest number of infractions received that month (or more than two posters in the event of a greater than two-way tie for 1st place or a tie for 2nd place) are placed in a poll and CUK posters can vote on who should be banned for a month. I feel this would have the following benefits:
- Discouraging bad behaviour
- Punishing bad behaviour
- Removing miscreants from the board
OG
So if not everyone agrees to this ostracism proposal, then by your own logic you're for the chop.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: