A Proposal for Improving CUK

[Old Greg]

Nah, you're still a w4nker.

Of course, as are you. But where are we all on the continuum of w4nkerdom?

[doodab]

Nah, you're still a w4nker.

It's not real.

[Old Greg]

It's not real.

Shhh.

[Churchill]

Shhh.

He said it's not real.

[Old Greg]

He said it's not real.

Then he's created a paradox as he is within the illusion.

[MarillionFan]

Of course, as are you. But where are we all on the continuum of w4nkerdom?

In a universe of tedium.

[Old Greg]

In a universe of tedium.

Then why bother posting?

[doodab]

In general no one can hear you scream.

[Old Greg]

In general no one can hear you scream.

So, if Churchill wets the bed in General and nobody cares, are the sheets wet?

[OwlHoot]

I would propose that each month, the two posters with the highest number of infractions received that month (or more than two posters in the event of a greater than two-way tie for 1st place or a tie for 2nd place) are placed in a poll and CUK posters can vote on who should be banned for a month. I feel this would have the following benefits:

- Discouraging bad behaviour
- Punishing bad behaviour
- Removing miscreants from the board

OG

Didn't the ancient Greeks also have a system whereby if someone proposed a new law, and this was not accepted, then the proposer was put to death? (Very sound idea if you ask me.)

So if not everyone agrees to this ostracism proposal, then by your own logic you're for the chop.