Jeez - 'kin slow news day or what !!! What a complete and utter made up story deliberately finding a different meaning to that which was meant - a skill women are particularly adept at.
Disagree with the policy by all means and offer an alternative - the current one DOESNT work.
Country is fubar, we are lucky there aren't riots and we are worrying about stuff like this.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Ken Clarke
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Ken Clarke"
Collapse
-
And that is all Ken needed to say. It pi55es me off when you get people jumping up and down on a comment without actually listening to what was being said. There are degrees of rape - hence the different levels of sentencing. There isn't a sane person out there that could argue that rape is wrong, but when the law sees a 17 year old having sex with a 15 year old as being rape, how can that be in the same bracket as a serial violent rapist.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostOf course there are different degrees of rape - that's why sentencing varies.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course there are different degrees of rape - that's why sentencing varies. It would make sense if the law reflected this.
The purpose of the proposed law change, is to encourage guilty rapists to plead guilty earlier rather than at the last minute, saving a lot of money, and, more importantly, distress to the victims. (Of course, it's the money that's the really issue...).
Definitely it was a gaffe. An open goal to the shrieking harridans of the opposition.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm sure this one will run and run, but one thing that needs to be pointed out is that the term "statutory rape" is not part of British law (Scotland may vary, as they very sensibly try to keep their legal system separate from the one the English inflict on themselves and others).
Sexual activity with a person under the age of consent (i.e. under sixteen years of age) is known as "sexual activity with a child" and is a straightforward offence when the older party is aged eighteen or over (Sexual Offences Act 2003 section 9, and various provisions in other sections of that Act). It's still illegal for a seventeen year old to engage in sexual activity with a fifteen year old, but it isn't rape unless it really is rape, so wouldn't affect the statistics in the way Clarke claimed. Clarke's example of a seventeen year old boy and a fifteen year old girl having consensual sex was flawed in that it betrayed his ignorance of the law, for that would not lead to the seventeen year old boy being prosecuted on a charge of rape.
Well, virtually everything he said betrayed ignorance, but that's one of the many details he looked like an idiot over.Last edited by NickFitz; 19 May 2011, 00:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Ken Clarke is in a wrong job - he should have run Treasury instead of Osborne.
Leave a comment:
-
You could be real. Frankly I find your posts ok but when the masses move against you who am I to stand against it?...Originally posted by russell View PostI'm not, thought I was kandr or nob25? Ever thought the possibility that I am a real person with feelings, and a huge ****?
Leave a comment:
-
FTFYOriginally posted by russell View PostI'm not, thought I was kandr or nob25? Ever thought the possibility that I am a real person with feelings, and also a huge c**t?
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe Ken meant it's not rape if a woman dresses up as a cleaner wearing a short skirt with a fancy lace bow tie on the back.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not, thought I was kandr or nob25? Ever thought the possibility that I am a real person with feelings, and a huge ****?Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostI'll be disappointed if Russell is Minestrone. It's not up to his usual high standard.Last edited by russell; 18 May 2011, 22:16.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21


Leave a comment: