• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Making sense of radiation doses"

Collapse

  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    I came across tardigrades (hardy blighters) that can withstand something like 1,000 times a human lethal dose, and radioactivity seeking fungi that are thriving at Chernobyl (which is now a nature sanctuary). The latter use melanin, so presumably have developed a bit of a suntan.
    tardigrades

    they even sound excellent

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    you know in blood, right, theres iron. to help move the oxygen around i think.
    what about a creature that uses lead instead ? like a radiation-proof heavy-weight tarkus-bomber







    I came across tardigrades (hardy blighters) that can withstand something like 1,000 times a human lethal dose, and radioactivity seeking fungi that are thriving at Chernobyl (which is now a nature sanctuary). The latter use melanin, so presumably have developed a bit of a suntan.

    Radiotrophic fungi are fungi which appear to use the pigment melanin to convert gamma radiation into chemical energy for growth.
    Radiotrophic fungus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Interesting, it's a rather attractive metal, I dare say you could make some nice jewellry from it, especially since it "glows" slightly, and you can even see it when your eyes are closed.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Oh yes. Definitely the gamma emissions.

    Nothing else penetrates brick walls quite like that.
    And at high enough energy the body is invisible to them too. These would presumably originate from cosmic sources rather than nuclear reactors.
    The most biological damaging forms of gamma radiation occur in the gamma ray window, between 3 and 10 MeV, with higher energy gamma rays being less harmful because the body is relatively transparent to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    According to Plutonium - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia plutonium has a metallic taste.

    It appears to be less toxic than Polonium, because polonium is more likely to have decayed before being passed out of the body.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Oh yes. Definitely the gamma emissions.

    Nothing else penetrates brick walls quite like that.
    you know in blood, right, theres iron. to help move the oxygen around i think.
    what about a creature that uses lead instead ? like a radiation-proof heavy-weight tarkus-bomber







    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    I've got a funny little geiger muller tube which is mostly steel.

    It counts cosmic rays at about 10 or 12 per minute.

    I didn't think it worked properly.

    When ZeitMater had radioiodine treatment, it detected her through a brick wall.

    Thousands of counts per minute.

    Maybe from gamma radiation?

    Being subjected to lots of neutrons wouldn't be much fun either, as you'd not only be radioactive, but could be classed a radiological waste too, once you're dead shortly afterwards of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Here's another way.
    Neat.

    Also check out Median lethal dose - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    For internal consumption. The poison dart frog does respectably here, as does Botox, polonium-210 and the rather group covered by ionising radiation (where alphas would do well I expect). It might have been nice to see plutonium and other radioactive substances listed individually, as per polonium, however.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    On the geiger counter front, I notice that a number of those geiger counters have the detector covered in what looks like cling film.

    A great way to stop it counting alphas I'd have thunk.
    As far as I understand it, Geiger counters tend to be a bit tulip at detecting alpha particles anyway, except special ones, and many appear to be tulip at detecting gamma radiation too. Fortunately it seems beta radiation (electrons and positrons) is present in all the dangerous stuff that might be in the air and food after a nuclear reactor has been sick, although it needs a certain amount of training to interpret the results correctly and better instruments exist:

    Problems fission products after nuclear reactor meltdowns: Iodine-131 initially, then Caesium-137 and Strontium-90

    Iodine-131 (half life 8 days) comprising 3% of nuclear fission products. Beta decay (mostly 190 keV to 606 keV, tissue penetration of 0.6 to 2 mm) and gamma rays. 10% of radiation dose is gamma radiation (mostly 364 keV).

    Caesium-137 (half-life about 30 years). Beta emission and gamma rays from Barium-137m (662 keV). Principal source of radiation in the zone of alienation around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The biological half-life of caesium is rather short at about 70 days

    Strontium-90. (half life about 29 years). Beta decay, 0.546 MeV. Almost no gamma radiation. Bone seeker.

    A particularly dirty blast could presumably spread uranium-235 & 238 about too, which as far as I understand aren't that dangerous! (needs more research). Plus plutonium which is very bad and will be picked up by alpha, beta, gamma or neutron detectors.

    In fact I'm not sure what use an alpha detector would be except to detect uranium and plutonium fission, and smoke detectors and stuff?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    A lot of ways of expressing doses are being used that span different periods of time amongst other things, ...
    Here's another way.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Headlines are pretty sensationalist. www.thesun.co.uk

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    I notice even the media are moving as far as they can from Fukushima, and they appear somewhat lacking in the Geiger counter department too, and yet when it comes to war they are rarely to be seen away from the front line where they are apt to get bumped off by the Americans. They do often report the officially provided radiation figures though, plus the disbelief of those figures by the citizens and outside commentators.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied

    The Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare raised the maximum allowable exposure for nuclear workers to 250 millisieverts from 100 millisieverts. It described the move as "unavoidable due to the circumstances."
    Japan hikes legal radiation dose for nuclear workers - Hawaii News - Staradvertiser.com
    The sacrifice of the few outweighs the needs of the many.

    They don't mention over what time period, so I can't place this in my list or chart.




    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    On site we had a film badge analysed every week to tell you it was too late. And when we went into active areas we had to collect a 'gammacom' which bleeped intermittently. At least with that one you knew if it bleeped like mad you ran away. Always bleeped most in the ponds area, I hated going there.

    On the pile cap during shutdown it hardly even bleeped, I hated foing there too, too many alarms going off....

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    A couple of Golden Globes at the very least.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X