• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Kate Cottrell at OTS?"

Collapse

  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by Sockpuppet View Post
    The same could be said about most contractors brough in to fix serious IT system issues.

    If you don't like it don't use them. I like kate and her company I just wondered if the article was wrong and meant to say Kate at B&C
    Theres nothing wrong with her work I wouldn't fault that, it's just hardly suprising she's biased about abolishing IR35

    Leave a comment:


  • Pacciae
    replied
    Originally posted by v8gaz View Post
    I believe the technical term in official circles is 'conflict of interest'.
    #

    Yes a BIG f$$$$$g conflict of intrest

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Originally posted by Pacciae View Post
    IMO it's not in Ms Cottrells interest to recommend abolishing IR35 as her business caters ONLY for IR35 and coming up with son of IR35 still keeps the likes of Ms Cottrell in business and feeding off contractors.shame really that there are so many bottom feeders.
    The same could be said about most contractors brough in to fix serious IT system issues.

    If you don't like it don't use them. I like kate and her company I just wondered if the article was wrong and meant to say Kate at B&C

    Leave a comment:


  • Pacciae
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But if it changes they make money advising us the new best way to do things.
    WHS

    Leave a comment:


  • Pacciae
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    So someone who makes a living from IR35 fudges the findings from the OTS report

    Its like asking Turkeys if we should ban christmas
    WHS

    Leave a comment:


  • Pacciae
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But if it changes they make money advising us the new best way to do things.
    IMO it's not in Ms Cottrells interest to recommend abolishing IR35 as her business caters ONLY for IR35 and coming up with son of IR35 still keeps the likes of Ms Cottrell in business and feeding off contractors.shame really that there are so many bottom feeders.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    If Income Tax is merged with NI (both of them with employer paying 0 extra) then you won't need IR35...

    Leave a comment:


  • v8gaz
    replied
    I believe the technical term in official circles is 'conflict of interest'.

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    So someone who makes a living from IR35 fudges the findings from the OTS report

    Its like asking Turkeys if we should ban christmas
    Is it ****!

    But carry on.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Not sure if the location of the report was cited, if not here it is:

    Can't be arsed to read it myself at the moment, but I noticed it discusses integrating income tax with National Insurance, possibly as part of a longer term structural reform.
    Last edited by TimberWolf; 11 March 2011, 18:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    But if it changes they make money advising us the new best way to do things.

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    So someone who makes a living from IR35 fudges the findings from the OTS report

    Its like asking Turkeys if we should ban christmas

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    IMHO there are two sides to this;

    As a +ve someone who understands the current complexities and why it doesn't work is involved.

    As a -ve someone whos livelyhood is based on its current complexity is involved.

    or really
    Last edited by Pondlife; 11 March 2011, 18:35.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    It is a great line of reasoning. Implement a tax law that's too complicated to understand. Set up an office to simplify tax laws that are too complicated to understand. Declare that you can't begin to simplify it, because it's too complicated to understand.

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Originally posted by Sockpuppet View Post
    Has Kate from Bayer and Cottrell gone to the OTS or is this me reading it wrong?

    OTS
    Bauer & Cottrell

    KUATB!
    IR35 expert hired by tax unit :: Contractor UK - Contracting News and Guides

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X