Reply to: Should the identity of reppers be revealed?

[d000hg]

anyone who negs should sign it, lest they be seen as a slimy, low rate, backstabbing twat

Signing it yes. But choosing who you sign it AS should be allowed

[EternalOptimist]

anyone who negs should sign it, lest they be seen as a slimy, low rate, backstabbing twat

anyone who pozzies should not sign it, lest they be seen as a creeping slimy, butt sucking, teat - nippling , ass-wipe scrotum




imo

[d000hg]

I voted "No" but I'd prefer +ve to be signed, and -ve anonymous.

Why is this a public poll?

[sasguru]

I thought you didn't give a stuff about the repping
Or have all the -ve marks started to upset you?

I don't really.
I had more +ve till today

And I have to admit
"Thou yeasty toad-spotted coxcomb"
is a little above the average standard

[MarillionFan]

I thought you didn't give a stuff about the repping
Or have all the -ve marks started to upset you?

There's a small puddle around his rep icon.

[cojak]

No.

Either have it anonymous or don't have it all.

I receive a huge amount of rep both positive and negative and the same people calling for an outing of reppers are the same ones leaving negatives anonymously.

Which in turn is all of you!

So either have it anonymous or don't have it all. And that also goes for tag cloud.

Not me. I sig all of my reps, +ve and -ve.

[Spacecadet]

Vote now

I thought you didn't give a stuff about the repping
Or have all the -ve marks started to upset you?

[Clippy]

WHS. I have never repped anyone (that I can remember anyway).
Far more fun insulting people to their face and getting it back.
There's something slimy and cowardly about neg-repping people anonymously, IMHO.

Agreed.

If you are going to diss someone, have the balls to do it in a thread and not behind the scenes.

[sasguru]

I'm quite happy to abuse people out in the open on this forum.

WHS. I have never repped anyone (that I can remember anyway).
Far more fun insulting people to their face and getting it back.
There's something slimy and cowardly about neg-repping people anonymously, IMHO.

[MarillionFan]

I have only given one negative rep (doogie) and that was just to see how it worked. I'm quite happy to abuse people out in the open on this forum.

I gave up abusing the tag cloud as it took too much effort and it always got cleaned up the next day.

You're bloody stingy with the +ve rep as well.

Typical Scotsman.

[minestrone]

I have only given one negative rep (doogie) and that was just to see how it worked. I'm quite happy to abuse people out in the open on this forum.

I gave up abusing the tag cloud as it took too much effort and it always got cleaned up the next day.

[ThomasSoerensen]

Enabling it retrospectively would be unfair, but I can see how doing so would appeal to admin's cruel sense of humour.

you do it for the surprise factor.

OUTED!!!!!!!!

[cailin maith]

No.

Either have it anonymous or don't have it all.

I receive a huge amount of rep both positive and negative and the same people calling for an outing of reppers are the same ones leaving negatives anonymously.

Which in turn is all of you!

So either have it anonymous or don't have it all. And that also goes for tag cloud.

Oh arse

I actually agree with you.

[Zippy]

I agree with MF.
If people are using reps to wage some personal vendetta then Admin can investigate.

[RichardCranium]

Enabling it retrospectively would be unfair, but I can see how doing so would appeal to admin's cruel sense of humour.