• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Come on you can't be serious"

Collapse

  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    Did he come quietly?

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    I read somewhere a while ago about some research into replacing the current air traffic control system with something that gave the individual planes more freedom but required them to follow simple rules like don't get within 5km of the next plane. Essentially leaving ATC to the pilots + automated systems.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Sorry, I meant I have often wondered why terrorists have failed to adopt radio controlled, or even self navigating, aircraft as weapons delivery systems. It can't be that hard to adapt a model airframe to a self navigating drone using off the shelf GPS, microcontrollers etc, certainly something that ought to be within the capability of a reasonably educated engineer with a budget of a few thousand.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I have often wondered why they have failed to adopt radio controlled, or even self navigating, aircraft.
    Because neither the pilots nor the passengers will allow it.

    One of the lectures I had at college (20+ years ago) was about radio navigation and the use of beacons at the airport to guide the plane in. It is merely an extension of the technology used by the Luftwaffe to accurately bomb cities in WWII by using tight beam radio signals. The difference is the modern autopilot can do a much better job of following it and landing the 'plane than the autopilots of the 1940s. Now a fly-by-wire 'plane would be far better than a human. A fly-by-wire autopilot could land an aeroplane in total darkness or 0% visibility from fog better than a human pilot on a clear sunny day.

    But the passengers would not accept it - would you get on a 'plane with no pilot?

    A couple or so years ago I sat through a presentation from a retired navigator about GPS in aircraft and how it kills people because they no longer plan their routes on paper and instead follow the straight-line GPS into mountains and restricted airspace. He said the time has come to abandon the idea of having stupid wetware in the cockpit and replace it with reliable hardware & software instead.

    Imagine the outrage at a headline like this:

    EasyJet announces: "Crew-free flights"

    From January EasyJet flights will have no crew aboard

    EasyJet staff look forward to a bleak Xmas as they have all been given 4 weeks' notice. As from 1st January, there will be no crew on any EasyJet flight. EasyJet claim it is to increase reliability and safety and is not about saving money. "Pilots make human errors and cannot land in fog so we're better off without them. Replacing them with a iPad will be a huge improvement."

    But the radical changes do not stop there. "Also, stewardesses raise anxiety and create a permanent atmosphere that flying is dangerous. Buses do not need conductors and aircraft do not need some tart to just say "Thank you for flying Tat Airways". Since they do not serve anything you want, we're getting rid of them too, which will remove the fear of flying there presence causes."

    An EasyJet spokesman said "These changes will make us the most reliable and safest airline in the world, overnight.
    Last edited by RichardCranium; 4 December 2010, 11:01. Reason: Because [QUOTE] adds italics which I didn't want

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I have often wondered why they have failed to adopt radio controlled, or even self navigating, aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I have often wondered why they have failed to adopt radio controlled, or even self navigating, aircraft.
    Some do
    Assassination by drone « Wanderingraven's Blog

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    I have often wondered why they have failed to adopt radio controlled, or even self navigating, aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Toy robot detours traffic near Coors Field
    There is actually a huge potential for terrorists using radio controlled cars. Was it the film Bullet or something of that era that used one?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    He was smuggling too. At least, he had a false bottom in his case

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    The world really has gone mad.
    Indeed. The following two were posted to twitter by @alqaeda yesterday:

    "Uh oh - TSA is now profiling semi-naked blonde women in wheelchairs. So much for _that_ plan." - Woman Strips Down to Her Lingerie, Gets TSA Pat Down Anyway—Twice

    "Making you paranoid about terrorism was always part of the plan, but this is really more than we hoped for." - Toy robot detours traffic near Coors Field

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I think he will get off lighty.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    That's a bit unfair.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    I think he will get off lighty, if it stands up in court.
    Last edited by Paddy; 3 December 2010, 11:22.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    "Percy Cummings, an interior designer from San Francisco..."

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    His name is Percy Cummings, his initials PC... you couldn't make it up.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X