• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More Doom: Immigration cap will devastate UK companies, employers fear"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Henry Ford was a Nazi? He would certainly have brought a real production line efficiency to the extermination process. Would have been like a chicken packing factory I worked at once but scaled up a bit.

    I'm still annoyed with the missus because she just came back from Berlin and didn't bring me a vodka glass with Adolph on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    But it's making a comeback with genetic engineering. It fell into disrepute after WWII and the Nazis' over zealous application.

    Ancient societies such as Sparta and Rome used it to prevent bringing up unproductive people.
    Yep, AtW and Sasguru just wouldn't have cut the mustard. What did the Romans ever do for us?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Henry Ford had the idea before Hitler.

    Eugenics - probably the most evil branch of biological science yet devised.
    But it's making a comeback with genetic engineering. It fell into disrepute after WWII and the Nazis' over zealous application.

    Ancient societies such as Sparta and Rome used it to prevent bringing up unproductive people.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Were they the ones that secretly thought Hitler had the right idea?
    Henry Ford had the idea before Hitler.

    Eugenics - probably the most evil branch of biological science yet devised.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    There is another thread on here about the Battle of Britain, I wonder how many of those guys would have looked at Britains ethnic make-up today and thought exactly the same
    Were they the ones that secretly thought Hitler had the right idea?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Always happy to be contradicted by anyone who puts a civilised rational argument SAS, you are quite right that if one simply threw out all low paid migrant workers out there would be chaos. Whether it is wise to keep increasing dependence on them rather than address our welfare problems and get, if necessary force, our own workshy into the workforce is debatable. Before we allow any worker to take a UK job we should ask far more searching questions than we do, not only check that worker thoroughly but the usefulness of the business he is working for and the possible impact on our own future skills base. Even leaving aside all these issues about society and economy, there is also a basic concern about population.

    Agree with other points. The welfare stats do show Indians/Chinese are lower than average on welfare. Think most have no problem with useful types of any origin.

    On your last point, this is my objection to the silliness of our policies. A policy that looked at the race of migrants should rightly be called racist, race as properly defined is irrelevant. However, ethnic origin, ie the culture they come from, is not irrelevant because people bring their cultures with them. As you say, Indians/Chinese are useful and those two countries are the most dynamic of all the emerging economies. That is not coincidence. If there have been failures to integrate a specific minority in the past, that should be a rational reason for not continuing to make the same mistake.

    One would think that even those who choose to dismiss any objections whatever by white British as racist ought not to overlook the impact on existing ethnic minorities who may be the ones most affected by the loss of lower paid jobs. Can't be bothered to look for them now but polls have indicated that concern about the nature and scale of immigration is pretty high among minorities too. People always imagine that all conflicts are about white vs the rest but they aren't, there have been violent frictions between ethnic groups too.

    Fragmented societies simply do not work, we need to try and find out way back to some semblance of a common culture rather than keep exacerbating our problems.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 23 August 2010, 12:34.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    The 2nd/3rd generation Chinese and Indians (especially the East African Asians) seem to be invariably hard-working and almost always in professional jobs or running succesful businesses.

    The Eastern Europeans will be indistinguishable after a generation apart from their funny surnames.
    Agree about the EA Asians. There was a load of poles in Bradford just after the second world war. They just disappeared as they assimilated and a lot took on their wives surnames. But then they're not culturally too far away from us.

    And that's what the main problem is, not race or colour but the vastly different outlook on life that are stretching the Toleration preached by John Locke.

    There are too many taboos that we don't do anything about for fear of being labelled racist.

    For instance

    http://www.channel4.com/.../dispatch...octors-feature

    Mrs Gibbon helps look after a family where all seven brothers have severe and profound Learning and Other Difficulties. You would think they would have realised to stop after two. This is costing the taxpayer Tens of Thousands a week.

    The trouble is that it isn't just cousins marrying once every 10 generation but every generation. But then again it's the will of Allah and nothing to do with defective genes.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    This subject always brings out emotional, inconsidered responses on both sides.
    Here are some facts:

    Contrary to popular belief, Labour did not change the policy for non-European immigration.

    The mistakes they made were mainly three-fold:

    1) Allowed the EU accession countries unlimited access to the UK labour market.
    2) Turned a blind eye to the abuse of the ICT system allowing most multinationals to get cheap labour through the back door.
    Every company in London has its floor full of Bobs nowadays.
    3) Made it harder for non-genuine asylum cases to be refused.

    Now as far as I can see, in London at least, all the menial jobs are being done by Eastern Europeans who seem to have displaced the lower classes of all races who did those jobs.

    @Xog, I would dispute your assertion that the lower paid do not contribute economically. From observation London would grind to a halt without the people who come in on the 5 o'clock night bus into town to do all the support work that allows the rest of us to make big money.
    The NHS would not exist without the cleaners, nurses and doctors from abroad who comprise 1/3 of its staff.

    One observation I would make (again this is London specific) is that immigration is a mixed bag.
    The 2nd/3rd generation Chinese and Indians (especially the East African Asians) seem to be invariably hard-working and almost always in professional jobs or running succesful businesses.
    Its more of a mixed bag with people from a Muslim background and Afro Caribbeans who do not seem to thrive as much. Their kids are bottom of the educational pile.
    The Eastern Europeans will be indistinguishable after a generation apart from their funny surnames.

    Of course a policy that looked at the ethnic origin of succesful immigrants would be deemed to be racist.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    London != England

    as for the tube, that's for permies. Get a car + driver ffs
    you haven't addressed my envelope



    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    I dunno. I did a contract at the beeb a few years ago. on the tube, most days, I never heard a single conversation carried out in English.
    I didnt like it




    London != England

    as for the tube, that's for permies. Get a car + driver ffs

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    l
    I personally don't have a problem with moderate numbers of useful migrants who fit in, do not cause us problems and contribute more than they pay in and I have said that many times on my blog and more than once on here I think. You just prefer to smeer anyone who does not toe your PC line in its entirety and apparently you do not deem it necessary to actually read what they have written.
    Is there a person on this planet who would have a problem with that?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    I dunno. I did a contract at the beeb a few years ago. on the tube, most days, I never heard a single conversation carried out in English.
    I didnt like it




    It's like that down the local park, although it's mostly eastern European being spoken. Mind you park demographics are weighted towards parents with young children, and tourists. Or at least tourist visas.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    I'd say that if it weren't for the low paid sandwich makers (and similar), the economy would come to a grinding halt. As the vast majority of "natives" aren't willing to work for anything below what a banking executive makes, where do we find someone to make sandwiches?
    Sandwiches will be a little more expensive due to increased labour costs? At least the economics wouldn't be distorted.

    I make my own sandwiches.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    nothing like viewing the country through tulip tinted specs

    I agree, plenty of companies have been abusing the availability of imigrants willing to work for next to nothing.
    I would not say that the UK is better or worse for immigration. Immigration seems to be more of a side effect of the UK's need to be at the centre of the world.
    I dunno. I did a contract at the beeb a few years ago. on the tube, most days, I never heard a single conversation carried out in English.
    I didnt like it




    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Have you ever gotten divorced, or finished with a bird and thought 'If I had known it was going to turn out like this, I would never have gotten involved' ??

    There is another thread on here about the Battle of Britain, I wonder how many of those guys would have looked at Britains ethnic make-up today and thought exactly the same



    nothing like viewing the country through tulip tinted specs

    I agree, plenty of companies have been abusing the availability of imigrants willing to work for next to nothing.
    I would not say that the UK is better or worse for immigration. Immigration seems to be more of a side effect of the UK's need to be at the centre of the world.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X