• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Evolution

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Evolution"

Collapse

  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    I think that's what I meant.

    I suppose I was thinking of changes to DNA that affect the organism's characteristics (through cell division or whatever) and can also be passed on through reproduction.
    Isn't that what happens with HIV?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    If by "evolve" you mean changes in the developed organsm (post formation of the zygote/embryo) which can be passed on to the next generation then no, an organism cannot evolve. I believe the work of Lamarck has been discredited in this respect.
    I think that's what I meant.

    I suppose I was thinking of changes to DNA that affect the organism's characteristics (through cell division or whatever) and can also be passed on through reproduction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    What do you mean by "evolve"?
    WHS

    If by "evolve" you mean changes in the developed organsm (post formation of the zygote/embryo) which can be passed on to the next generation then no, an organism cannot evolve. I believe the work of Lamarck has been discredited in this respect.
    If you mean "evolution" pre or during the formation of the zygote/embryo then yes, this can happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post

    Can an individual organism evolve, i.e. aside from reproduction?
    Could happen slowly in theory, for example to organisms that can reproduce asexually, such as trees which bud new trees from their roots.

    (Retroviruses could screw up and rearrange their DNA for example.)

    edit: I read or (mis)interpreted that as "aside from sexual reproduction".
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 4 August 2010, 05:44.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Is this some windup that will end in a comment about the user base of CUK??

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Many generations from now, your offspring may evolve to be as intelligent, good looking and generally brilliant as moi.
    But I wouldn't count on it.
    But only if some cataclysmic event involving gamma rays, insecticides, and spores from the Ugly Tree are involved!!

    However, why wait generations when a steamroller can create aesthetics you would be proud of sas?

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Can an individual organism evolve, i.e. aside from reproduction?
    Your stomach flora (which could be argued is part of you as a whole organism) might well evolve to cope with your diet

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Will sasguru evolve into a useful member of society or will he always be a clueless fuqwit?
    Many generations from now, your offspring may evolve to be as intelligent, good looking and generally brilliant as moi.
    But I wouldn't count on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    But that's not evolution as you don't pass the cancer on, i.e. your sperm doesn't get created with the cancerous dna.

    Older males actually cause most change as their dna replication is not as good as when younger so a higher chance of a mutation at conception. This is not the case with women though whose eggs are formed at birth.

    Philosophically speaking cancer is a strange thing. It's own success brings on it's own demise and therefore brings into question what is life about,. (not in the 7 characteristics explanation). Cancer seems to show that we are a collection of co-operating cells but in an accidental way where each cell is 'selfish'.
    Cancer does not have success or failure criteria, it is not an organism in it's own right. It is a malfunction of part of the existing organism brought about by genetic predisposition or external influences. It is more akin to rust on a car that consumes the bodywork and eventually leads to it's destruction than a conventional illness caused by virus or bacteria that, while it may cause a disease fatal to it's host, gets to replicate and distribute itself to other hosts in the process.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    But that's not evolution as you don't pass the cancer on, i.e. your sperm doesn't get created with the cancerous dna.
    Quite right - really this was a case of "the answer to the question is mainly no, but can I think of a way to make it yes..?"

    gingergedi - of course - I was about to publish my cancer cure, but then I got offered a contract for £300/day 10 minutes from home and the rest is history. You'll have to try the OncologistUK forum instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
    In the sense of "have a genetic mutation mid-life" - yes. Cancer is an example of that.
    But that's not evolution as you don't pass the cancer on, i.e. your sperm doesn't get created with the cancerous dna.

    Older males actually cause most change as their dna replication is not as good as when younger so a higher chance of a mutation at conception. This is not the case with women though whose eggs are formed at birth.

    Philosophically speaking cancer is a strange thing. It's own success brings on it's own demise and therefore brings into question what is life about,. (not in the 7 characteristics explanation). Cancer seems to show that we are a collection of co-operating cells but in an accidental way where each cell is 'selfish'.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    What do you mean by "evolve"?
    Will sasguru evolve into a useful member of society or will he always be a clueless fuqwit?

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    What do you mean by "evolve"?

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
    In the sense of "have a genetic mutation mid-life" - yes. Cancer is an example of that.
    Can you explain how this happens and what triggers it?

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    In the sense of "have a genetic mutation mid-life" - yes. Cancer is an example of that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X