In cases like this, whoever signed off the use of such powers within the council should be held personally responsible in the same way the head of companies are personally liable under H&S laws when someone dies due to lax safety procedures.
I'm sure that would make the jobs worths in the council think twice about using such powers.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Poole council in 'spying' tribunal
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Poole council in 'spying' tribunal"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostPoole council loses school catchment 'spying' tribunal
Although Poole Council lost the tribunal does anyone know if the result of the monitoring found that they had indeed applied fraudulently or are they not allowed to disclose that as the methods were found to be illegal?
I am sure the law will be changed to take some powers away from local authorities because of this case.
Leave a comment:
-
Poole council in 'spying' tribunal
Poole council loses school catchment 'spying' tribunal
Although Poole Council lost the tribunal does anyone know if the result of the monitoring found that they had indeed applied fraudulently or are they not allowed to disclose that as the methods were found to be illegal?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Today 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Yesterday 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: