Latest Climate Research

[doodab]

Whoosh! As the point goes way over your head.... You aren't trying to tell me what I'm having for dinner, and I am going to take a dump, in less than 10 years too.

I think my point has been lost on you.

FWIW, I am not a global warming "believer", and I'm not disagreeing with your conclusion, I just don't like mush-brained pseudo-logic, and your line of reasoning falls squarely into that category I'm afraid.

Weather forecasting and climate modelling are two different (albeit in some ways related) things. By all means pick holes in the work of climate modellers, but discounting their work out of hand because their weather forecasting colleagues struggle to overcome difficulties inherent in what they do just isn't a rational point of view.

[Fred Bloggs]

An appropriate response to the gurning cretinism exhibited in this thread.

(If you are old enough to remember.) The same people told us we were heading into a new ice age in the 1970's.

[Fred Bloggs]

If I can't tell you what you're going to have for dinner next week, does that mean you don't believe me when I say you're probably going to take a tulip in ten years time?

Whoosh! As the point goes way over your head.... You aren't trying to tell me what I'm having for dinner, and I am going to take a dump, in less than 10 years too.

[sasguru]

If I can't tell you what you're going to have for dinner next week, does that mean you don't believe me when I say you're probably going to take a tulip in ten years time?

An appropriate response to the gurning cretinism exhibited in this thread.

[doodab]

Yes, I can see that, but the climate causes the weather day by day. So if they can't tell me if it going to rain next week, why should I believe what they say will happen in 100 years time?

If I can't tell you what you're going to have for dinner next week, does that mean you don't believe me when I say you're probably going to take a tulip in ten years time?

[SupremeSpod]

Yes, I can see that, but the climate causes the weather day by day. So if they can't tell me if it going to rain next week, why should I believe what they say will happen in 100 years time?

Blind faith, mate! Religions have been using the same tenets for thousands of years.

[Fred Bloggs]

Yes, I can see that, but the climate causes the weather day by day. So if they can't tell me if it going to rain next week, why should I believe what they say will happen in 100 years time?

[Fred Bloggs]

When the forecasters cannot manage to tell me if it will rain next Tuesday, why would anyone believe the same people when they tell you what is going to happen 100 years from now?

[doodab]

One thing is for certain, "much more research (and accompanying taxpayer funding) will be needed".............

Regardless of what you think about global warming I don't really see any harm in further research into how the climate works. If nothing else, it's the only way to decide whether it's all bollocks or not.

[SupremeSpod]

It could just be China justifying their lack of pollution control...

[shaunbhoy]

What does this mean for the alarmist catastrophic predictions, one might ask onesself.

I believe it means that these results will be omitted when they "run the numbers", in case they adversely skew the cosy concensus of impending doom.

HTH

One thing is for certain, "much more research (and accompanying taxpayer funding) will be needed".............

[BlasterBates]

Shows that in China the "warming" over the last few decades is not unusual.

World Climate Report

What does this mean for the alarmist catastrophic predictions, one might ask onesself.