Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The reason we need a Capital punishment option"
Well apparently we will all be allowd to vote on where we want public spending cuts
And I have to say people who have been clearly convicted of child abuse/murder can take a bullet for all I care - they decided societies rules did not apply to them - so why should we spend money keeping them alive.
Next in line is lazy chav scum
closely followed by teenage slappers who see having as many kids of as many different colours as a career option.
Well apparently we will all be allowd to vote on where we want public spending cuts
And I have to say people who have been clearly convicted of child abuse/murder can take a bullet for all I care - they decided societies rules did not apply to them - so why should we spend money keeping them alive.
Next in line is lazy chav scum
closely followed by teenage slappers who see having as many kids of as many different colours as a career option.
I pretty much agree that life should mean no chance of parole in the case of child killers, but the system we have pretty much works. I don't think the cost/benefit is there to change it.
If it's "cost/benefit" you're after, try a couple of yards of (reusable) rope over a (reusable) beam versus the cost of keeping this piece of human offal alive for another 31 years.
Big deal. It was 50 years, now it's 40... still a very long time by which he'd be too old to be a threat, which is kind of the point.
I can't even imagine what 5 years in prison would be like, let alone 40. Think I'd rather be dead.
As does Huntley and a few other ***** who won't ever be let out.
Big deal. It was 50 years, now it's 40... still a very long time by which he'd be too old to be a threat, which is kind of the point.
I can't even imagine what 5 years in prison would be like, let alone 40. Think I'd rather be dead.
Thank you. I will ignore the asterix and take you at your word.
Asterisk
Speaking as a bed-wetting etc etc, if it was my child I would illogically want him released so I could hunt him down and torture him to death slowly.
What is most crap about this is that we are all paying a fortune for judges and lawyers and all their lackeys and flunkies to muck about knocking a largely irrelevant 10 years off what by any sensible measure was already too short a sentence for what he did.
Leave a comment: