• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Gul of Mexico is now a fire hazard"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by churchill View Post
    nope, they're going to be raped by the yanks.
    wtcs

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    I'm surprised there isn't a ready market for people going out and collecting oil off the surface.

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    I wonder if diver is there?
    his pcg nomination indicates that he has been there.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    AIUI, the basic problem is that blowout preventers are designed to work with a certain strength of pipe (they have a pair of blades that are explosively released to cut through the pipe and block it if a sudden pressure surge is detected.) But being at 5000 feet, the pipe was too thick for the blades to cut through it! DOH!

    In fact there are two or three devices designed to do the same thing, and all of them failed for basically that reason - Nobody thought to strengthen them for the grade of pipe in use.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    As I understand it, once you've installed the blowout preventer it's not industry practice to ever check it again.

    Can't really blame BP for that, but I expect it to cost them a pretty penny.
    Even when it has a flat battery?

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The BP disaster seems to be caused in a similar way where nobody was employed to check the safety features.
    As I understand it, once you've installed the blowout preventer it's not industry practice to ever check it again.

    Can't really blame BP for that, but I expect it to cost them a pretty penny.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    What really pi$$es me off is that this accident, like the Total Oil Depot fire and many othes are caused by the greed and cutting costs. In the Total disaster, by just one person on duty to check basic equipment would have prevented disaster. The BP disaster seems to be caused in a similar way where nobody was employed to check the safety features. Each piece of equipment was someone else’s responsibility.
    You dont know whether it was cost cutting that led to this disaster. Your assertation is an open ended cliche which suggests that no matter how much money is thrown at prevention in the event of an accident it will never be enough.
    An important point here is that it has happened on the doorstep of the USA as opposed to offshore Brazil, Angola and other remote parts of the world. This will force the Industry to look very closely at drilling offshore in deep waters/wells, and it will also make the worlds largest consumer of Oil look again at its own policies.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    I wonder if diver is there?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    What really pi$$es me off is that this accident, like the Total Oil Depot fire and many othes are caused by the greed and cutting costs. In the Total disaster, by just one person on duty to check basic equipment would have prevented disaster. The BP disaster seems to be caused in a similar way where nobody was employed to check the safety features. Each piece of equipment was someone else’s responsibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Nope, they're going to be raped by the Yanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    started a topic The Gul of Mexico is now a fire hazard

    The Gul of Mexico is now a fire hazard

    oh dear!

    http://http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aBNgvb9TEqE4&pos=9

    Will BP actually survive this?

Working...
X