• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Who will be the new government?"

Collapse

  • The Wikir Man
    replied
    Tory minority government seems to be doing OK in Canada.

    IIRC, 62 out of the 95 years of PR in Australia have had some kind of Conservative representation (but I can't remember where I read that).

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    BBC news seems much more supporting/expecting ConDem, aren't they supposed to be Labour-biased?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Surely it would take the majority of MPs to agree to a referendum on PR.

    As I understand it, nearly all the Tories and two thirds of Labour MPs are against PR, if for no other reason than it will cost them jobs.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Originally posted by Bright Spark View Post
    lets blame the stupid british electorate for voting for this disaster
    At least it might might make joe public think twice about PR if it gets put to a referendum.

    Ironically, it is probably much more difficult to persuade the public on PR when you actually have a hung parliament. It would have been much easier when Thatcher or Blair were holding large majorities, but then of course no government in this position would hold a referendum.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Spark
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    It appears that it will be a double disaster. The Liberals are leaning towards a Lib Lab pact with the help of Scottish Nationalists, NI MPs and the Green Party

    It will mean bribes such a massive cash inputs to Scotland and NI and wacky green measures. We will have Brown until October and after that we will have Mandelson.
    lets blame the stupid british electorate for voting for this disaster

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    I preferred them when they were fiddling their expenses. It was a lot less sleazy than what's going on now. I think it was David Blunkett this morning who described the libdems as harlots.

    All their pronouncements on Friday of acting in the country's best interests ring very hollow now.

    If the libdems can't work with the party that polled the largest number of votes then what does it say for PR?

    It beggars belief that they would even think of entering a minority coalition with Labour which depends on the implicit support of the nationalists. It is also ironic, given the presidential nature of the campaign focusing almost entirely on the leader's debates, that we'd end up with another unelected PM.

    Shame on them if this is what they lumber us with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    It appears that it will be a double disaster. The Liberals are leaning towards a Lib Lab pact with the help of Scottish Nationalists, NI MPs and the Green Party

    It will mean bribes such a massive cash inputs to Scotland and NI and wacky green measures. We will have Brown until October and after that we will have Mandelson.

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    I was reading about the LibDems & their triple lock on election reform. Basically, it knocks any chance of a coalition without a PR referendum into a cocked hat. Unless the cons will go with that then we're in for a minority government and all the joy that brings.
    But on their own, the LDs haven't got a chance of ever instigating electoral reform, I think they'll realise that even if they only get a referendum on PR as promised by DC, it's further than they would otherwise be. And who knows, it might get voted in.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Labour split over prospect of 'obscene' Lib-Lab coalition - Times Online

    Looks like Labour are falling apart anyway, never mind holding together a ‘shoulder chip coalition’.
    Another ministerial source told The Times: "It strikes me this is all about giving Gordon another six months in the job."
    Spot on I reckon..

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Spark
    replied
    probably be a labDem alliance, get in the new voting system ASAP, then go to polls in 6months,
    likely that the two will have a larger majority due to PR voting and getting rid of Gordo.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    I voted fall apart, but I think there will be a half-arsed attempt at a LabLibMango rabble that will collapse within weeks.
    I agree with that. In actual fact I believe that may be the best thing for the Tories in the long term, although probably not the best thing for the country in the short term. Time will tell.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Until the money runs out.
    You don't have to worry about that - this time it's different.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Labour split over prospect of 'obscene' Lib-Lab coalition - Times Online

    Looks like Labour are falling apart anyway, never mind holding together a ‘shoulder chip coalition’.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Haven't got a clue...

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The IMF.
    WHS++

    Until the money runs out.

    Then it's Banjo time.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X