Reply to: AOTN - Banned?

[realityhack]

Oh, I would.

Especially when I ban RH again for picking on me.

[NotAllThere]

From the development server:

NotAllThere
Sin Binned

It looks like this is possible by creating the appropriate usergroups. However I don't know whether admin and the mods want to be bothered with the additional step of selecting the appropriate usergroup from a dropdown menu when imposing a ban (bin?).

Oh, I would.

Especially when I ban RH again for picking on me.

[Churchill]

I quite like the mystery.

Oh you tease!

[Zippy]

Maybe we (that'd be you Mods and Admin as opposed to us) should call the 24hr bans - Sin Binned - that way we will know the poster will be back.

I quite like the mystery.

[realityhack]

From the development server:

NotAllThere
Sin Binned

It looks like this is possible by creating the appropriate usergroups. However I don't know whether admin and the mods want to be bothered with the additional step of selecting the appropriate usergroup from a dropdown menu when imposing a ban (bin?).

I'm fine with that.
So is NAT officially the first to be banned on the new server?

[NickFitz]

Sin Binned for 1-3 days
Banned for longer temporary
Binned for permanent.
and Bunned for losing a

From the development server:

NotAllThere
Sin Binned

It looks like this is possible by creating the appropriate usergroups. However I don't know whether admin and the mods want to be bothered with the additional step of selecting the appropriate usergroup from a dropdown menu when imposing a ban (bin?).

[sasguru]

I guess it's back to footy/handbags/ what I had for lunch/ look how rich I am/ topics

You could always start a "Look what an impoverished twunt I am" thread for balance.

[Churchill]

Nothing in that thread appears to warrant a banning - It looks like the herd mentality at it again & and mods/admins only too happy to accomodate.

I guess it's back to footy/handbags/ what I had for lunch/ look how rich I am/ topics

Try harder

[cailin maith]

Nothing in that thread appears to warrant a banning - It looks like the herd mentality at it again & and mods/admins only too happy to accomodate.

I guess it's back to footy/handbags/ what I had for lunch/ look how rich I am/ topics

Actually, you wouldn't know just by reading the thread now as RH deleted some of his posts which were in bad taste, he said.

[Pogle]

Nothing in that thread appears to warrant a banning - It looks like the herd mentality at it again & and mods/admins only too happy to accomodate.

I guess it's back to footy/handbags/ what I had for lunch/ look how rich I am/ topics

I was not around either, but even I have picked up on the fact that he was being a twep about someone who had died from a long and painful illness.
I believe the post have been removed

[MaryPoppins]

I think we should have "Banned to Infinity and beyond"

Sounds better than mine, yes.

[Pogle]

I think we should have "Banned to Infinity and beyond"

Are you volunteering to try it out?

[Troll]

Nothing in that thread appears to warrant a banning - It looks like the herd mentality at it again & and mods/admins only too happy to accomodate.

I guess it's back to footy/handbags/ what I had for lunch/ look how rich I am/ topics

[sasguru]

I think we should have "Banned to Infinity and beyond"

[MarillionFan]

I had two massive bets from a couple of new posters calling themselves Mr ShhGuru and a Mr Clement Atlee on the next banning.

We are presently investigating.