• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Went to the Natural History Museum today"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    I know evolutionists don't know when man first walked the earth so let's assume the first human walked the earth year X B.C.

    My question is- who were his/her parents? Non-humans? We're supposed to believe non-humans gave birth to a human?

    What utter nonsense. Zoom in on the evolution claims and you will find it for the fraud that it is.
    I'll throw one attempt in, you can play with it as you see fit.

    Forget humans. What about poodles? Have they existed from the start of the Earth? If not then by your logic a poodle was birthed by non-poodle parents. But poodles or other breeds are clearly recorded as being created by man... as are domestic cows.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    Just watch this thread the same will happen here, I will be attacked rather than my questions answered.
    Only because your questions don't make any sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Let's not get started on Dawkins. He's the most arrogant close-minded scientist I think I ever saw. He's like Stallman... smart but I imagine a total pain to work with.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    ...
    My question is- who were his/her parents? Non-humans? We're supposed to believe non-humans gave birth to a human?...
    No, you're supposed to understand that the evolution is about gradual species change. That populations diverge, until the reach a point they can no longer interbreed with the source population (or what that has evolved into), and then we classify that as a new species.

    The reason your questions are not being answered and you are being ridiculed, is because the questions are based on what your idea of evolution is, not evolutionists think it is. This kind of logical fallacy is not limited to creationists. Dawkins, for example, has a view what Christians believe that is at variance with what many actually believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    That's what they do since they cannot deal with the objections to this fraudulent evolution theory that so many treat like a religion.

    Just watch this thread the same will happen here, I will be ignored rather than my questions answered.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • contractor79
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I read Behe's book. Some fascinating biochemistry. And I think he raises a case to answer toward evolution. It's a shame that the evolutionists attacked the man, rather than the ball
    That's what they do since they cannot deal with the objections to this fraudulent evolution theory that so many treat like a religion.

    Just watch this thread the same will happen here, I will be attacked rather than my questions answered.

    Leave a comment:


  • contractor79
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You've gone too far to be believable even by your own standard.
    You're not answering the question because it's patently obvious that evolution is nonsense.

    I know evolutionists don't know when man first walked the earth so let's assume the first human walked the earth year X B.C.

    My question is- who were his/her parents? Non-humans? We're supposed to believe non-humans gave birth to a human?

    What utter nonsense. Zoom in on the evolution claims and you will find it for the fraud that it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    I'm sure the things on display are good, marred only by the evolution storytelling descriptions which are there to brainwash children away from the truth and glory of God's creation.
    you are Chico and I claim my 5 free hail mary's

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Evolution is like Global Warming in that respect... if you raise any doubts about it you face derision as a crank and even solid scientific research gets ignored or viewed with a heavy bias.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I read Behe's book. Some fascinating biochemistry. And I think he raises a case to answer toward evolution. It's a shame that the evolutionists attacked the man, rather than the ball, and that Behe proposed his own solution to the issues raised. There was the possibility of some good science coming out of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Fred Hoyle proposed ID decades ago. He rejected evolution on mathematical grounds. And was an atheist...
    Looking in any detail at biochemistry or biology does quickly become horrendously complicated, it seems amazing a few billion years is apparently long enough! Like throwing a box of sugar cubes in the air and they land in a perfect cube.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    no I don't

    do tell us when human beings became human beings, give me a date in time, thanks.
    You've gone too far to be believable even by your own standard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Pogle View Post
    Wise boy
    Give my regards to Swindon, I'm off this week
    Will do, have fun!

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Out of interest, does anyone know where the spaghetti monster meme comes from?
    Bobby Henderson founded a satirical religion in 2005, known as pastafarianism, as a reaction against ID. ID refers to no specific creator, so Bobby suggested that it could equally be the FSM wot dunnit.

    Fred Hoyle proposed ID decades ago. He rejected evolution on mathematical grounds. And was an atheist...

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    I couldn't possibly comment - and live!
    Wise boy
    Give my regards to Swindon, I'm off this week

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X