• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Anyone know.....

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Anyone know....."

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Permies are no doubt being benched because of it too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I actually wish there was a more militant contractor group for IT folk.
    There is luv. We are it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I think she is a cylon.
    I've seen BSG and there is now way she is a cylon

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    You could do something about it yourself
    "Anne became an independent consultant at the end of 2005 and promptly joined PCG. She became a member of the CC in 2008 and a Director in 2009"
    I think she is a cylon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I actually wish there was a more militant contractor group for IT folk.

    I think the Bob situation could be easily sorted if some people got motivated and grew a big set of balls.

    The PCG are so crap on this subject they honestly look to me like they work for the other camp.
    You could do something about it yourself
    "Anne became an independent consultant at the end of 2005 and promptly joined PCG. She became a member of the CC in 2008 and a Director in 2009"

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I actually wish there was a more militant contractor group for IT folk.

    I think the Bob situation could be easily sorted if some people got motivated and grew a big set of balls.

    The PCG are so crap on this subject they honestly look to me like they work for the other camp.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
    Who?

    Bob Shawadywadi

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Does the PCG actually work for us?
    Who?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by BenchMaster View Post
    IMO the message should also be about the barely-above-minimum-wage rates being advertised for some highly skilled roles.
    And why we are bringing them in when there are people here that could do the work.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Does the PCG actually work for us?

    Leave a comment:


  • BenchMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
    IMO the message should also be about the barely-above-minimum-wage rates being advertised for some highly skilled roles.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    You see, what you have said there is still not correct. What we should calculate is the rate x number of contractors/bench. That way we can see the value of the contracting market and how it has changed!
    Why should Joe Bloggs care about the size of the contract market? Rates for contractors are pretty high and few will have sympathy for any rate cuts or the size of the market share diminishing. Being jobless and claiming unemployment due to being undercut by Bob is another matter.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Reading that I do wish people would not blurt out fixed day rates, 300 hundred a day gets turned into 75 grand a year and then the message is instantly turned against us.
    It doesn't matter how you spin it, even if you say £300/day is more like £40k/year, it's way more than the masses make in every-day jobs and the average Sun reader is going to think you're Mr MoneyBags.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
    Yup, sort out the bob situation and rates will look after themselves.

    The PCG have got the wrong end of the horse here and showing extraordinary naivety.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
    You see, what you have said there is still not correct. What we should calculate is the rate x number of contractors/bench. That way we can see the value of the contracting market and how it has changed!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X