• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Anyone know.....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
    You see, what you have said there is still not correct. What we should calculate is the rate x number of contractors/bench. That way we can see the value of the contracting market and how it has changed!
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
      The message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
      Yup, sort out the bob situation and rates will look after themselves.

      The PCG have got the wrong end of the horse here and showing extraordinary naivety.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by minestrone View Post
        Reading that I do wish people would not blurt out fixed day rates, 300 hundred a day gets turned into 75 grand a year and then the message is instantly turned against us.
        It doesn't matter how you spin it, even if you say £300/day is more like £40k/year, it's way more than the masses make in every-day jobs and the average Sun reader is going to think you're Mr MoneyBags.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
          You see, what you have said there is still not correct. What we should calculate is the rate x number of contractors/bench. That way we can see the value of the contracting market and how it has changed!
          Why should Joe Bloggs care about the size of the contract market? Rates for contractors are pretty high and few will have sympathy for any rate cuts or the size of the market share diminishing. Being jobless and claiming unemployment due to being undercut by Bob is another matter.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
            The message should be about the numbers being benched, not about taking rate cuts.
            IMO the message should also be about the barely-above-minimum-wage rates being advertised for some highly skilled roles.

            Comment


              #16
              Does the PCG actually work for us?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by BenchMaster View Post
                IMO the message should also be about the barely-above-minimum-wage rates being advertised for some highly skilled roles.
                And why we are bringing them in when there are people here that could do the work.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                  Does the PCG actually work for us?
                  Who?

                  Me, me, me...

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
                    Who?

                    Bob Shawadywadi

                    Comment


                      #20
                      I actually wish there was a more militant contractor group for IT folk.

                      I think the Bob situation could be easily sorted if some people got motivated and grew a big set of balls.

                      The PCG are so crap on this subject they honestly look to me like they work for the other camp.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X