Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
How the flip can you deny those charges? You either were or you wern't. Seems a bit clear cut to me
Law doesn't work that way.
Barrack room lawyer talk:
You have 'actus reus', the guilty act, and 'mens rea', the guilty thought.
So if he has been photographed then you could say here is the actus reus, yet he could have been stripped of all his clothes and left with a pile of an alternate, what could he do, agian, what if he is mentally ill, then you fail on mens rea.
He could argue on what constitutes the inappropriate clothing.
He is also accused of wearing a skirt and having bare legs at 9.05am on January 27 this year, and again at 9.07am the following day - again breaching his Asbo.
During a short hearing today Trigger denied all three charges.
How the feck can you deny those charges? You either were or you wern't. Seems a bit clear cut to me
Leave a comment: