Originally posted by stek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Direct marketing working (kind of)
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Direct marketing working (kind of)"
Collapse
-
Would someone please translate the kiddie txtspk in this post into English for me so that I can read this without getting a headache?
-
U can also telnet onto their mail server on port 25 and issue some SMTP commands;
HELO and a MAIL FROM and a RCPT TO I think from memory....
The first two u can prolly make up, the third will be rejected if it's not valid.
U'll also need to query DNS for the MX record of the domain to get the proper mail server host.
Long time since I did this so I might have it a bit wrong!
Leave a comment:
-
Places don't typically have a catch-all *@company.com? That would make it hard to tell it was received, unless you put one of those read receipts on using Outlook.
Leave a comment:
-
I did that yesterday to one company I new had my skill set and I wanted to work for.
It took three attempts for the email not to bounce
<firstname><lastname>@comany.com - failed
<firstname> . <lastname>@comany.com - failed
but
<intial><lastname>@company.com worked
I've not had a response yet
Leave a comment:
-
Good job! Having recently left a permie role, it became very tedious wading through CVs from agents. No-one ever approached me like that, but I suspect they would have got a little more attention than most - by emailing (and presumably therefore revealing name and gender) you've already made yourself into a person rather then just a skillset, and demonstrated proactiveness, communication skills etc. Hope you get the right result!
Leave a comment:
-
It's usually not too difficult to work out what strategy a company uses for forming email addresses, assuming they have one at all. Find a few email addresses for individuals at the company and it's normally pretty clear that they do something like first.last@example.com, last.f@example.com and so forth.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDid you try various email permutations and see which worked?
Oddly enough it seems to be bigger computing-related companies that have weirder policies; for example, Microsoft uses some letters from your first name and the initial of your surname, such as billg, raymondc - although a friend of mine with a double-barelled surname had the first six letters of his first name followed by the two initials of his two-part surname. (As one might expect with MS, it's also slightly more confusing than that for outsiders.)
Of course it gets even more complicated when they start adding numbers at the end of duplicated names: there's not much point sending email to mary.smith@example.com if Mary Smith the catering manager was there before Mary Smith the project manager, who got lumbered with mary.smith2
Leave a comment:
-
No. Only sent two email got two replies. So I guess it worked first time.Did you try various email permutations and see which worked?
Funny thing is I replied to twenty jobserve ads the previous week without a sniff so it's nice to get some positive feedback.
I think I got replies because the companies are a perfect fit for my niche skillset. So that doesn't scale too well.
The thing is it was much easier to right a decent covering letter because I knew it who was going to be read my someone who would have a clue and be interested.
Nothing may come of it... but it's a nice different approach.
Leave a comment:
-
Nice. I've toyed with it but never at a sustained/serious level.
Did you try various email permutations and see which worked?
Leave a comment:
-
Direct marketing working (kind of)
So I did that thing that I've been meaning to do for a while.
Came up with a list of companies that sound cool and who would be interested in my skillset.
Searched on google, linkedin, etc to find the names of technical directors.
Came up with two names in two companies.
Guessed their email addresses by a cunningly combining their names and companies to get firstnamelastname@company.com.
Emailed them Monday with my CV and an email apologising for approaching them directly but pointing out my experience and interest.
Nothing all week then two responses today.
One guy has no opportunities at the moment but we chatted over a few emails and he "has my CV at the top of the pile". It sounds like he actually means it rather the evil HR shove off with a smile.
Other chap wants to speak to me next week to "discuss opportunities."
So that's at least a little bit positive and not an agent in sight!
Anyone else do this kind of thing?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Today 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10

Leave a comment: