Originally posted by suityou01
View Post
Now this skillset has become the norm and people get bad reviews for something that they were not hired for...
Personally I don't believe that it's IT technical people causing projects to fail but it certainly is the friction that is between people with different skillset.
A good manager (people skills, this unknown) should be able to create an environment in which people respect and trust each other and not a stupid army-like competition workplace.
The critics of people who passed the fence from technical role to BA/PMs role are just as wrong as technical people showing off their skill to humiliate no-techy. You contribute as much as them to a hostile work environment and you are a burden to productivity.
One last thing: ok, all of us managed to learn a lot of skills. However I can't believe that this super-human worker who knows business, architecture, development, project management, 25 languages and knows how to clean the desk is a natural evolution of IT. I just think that is a dysfunctional character created by the necessity of unjustified belt tightening. Perhaps it was necessary but I think that to be efficient people should do their own role (BAs are BAs, architects are architects, developers are developers, etc.). Of course, the fact that you have learned another skill is certainly useful (I for example had a 2-year experiences in sales, all good - but at the end I do another role so the importance of it is marginal) but at the end you only have one role to specialise and where you can add a genuine business value.
Leave a comment: