Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Had 4 offers come through recently for Connectirect as basically all German financial institutions have to use it. Its just a more secure file transfer application
One impact, among many, was that RBS' cheque clearing system, based on software called Connect Direct,
Had 4 offers come through recently for Connectirect as basically all German financial institutions have to use it. Its just a more secure file transfer application
My limited experiance with HP suggests that testing is not their thing! I used to work with Enterprise Discovery that HP flog. It's used to scan and report on hardware and software and you are supposed to be able to base your sw licensing costs on it. The problem we found was that ED was discovering Windows 2003 std and windows 2003 ent. The cost difference between the 2 is huge. On our project alone this little glitch would have hit us with 300k of sw costs if we'd trusted the ED numbers. I pulled apart the ED fingerprint for 2003 std to find they had missed a couple of files - after adding these in the products were correctly identified. I passed this back to HP who 2 mins after they got my info, told us that they would issue it as part of their next update. They didn't test it. In their next update my change was included but no info from HP to inform users that there may have been an issue with the produts identified in previous months
"An IBM Z10 at EDS's Stockley Park site, west of London, fell over this week after vital microcode fixes had not been applied, because all the qualified staff had been fired."
"An IBM Z10 at EDS's Stockley Park site, west of London, fell over this week after vital microcode fixes had not been applied, because all the qualified staff had been fired."
Leave a comment: