- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Suzi Perry - would you?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Suzi Perry - would you?"
Collapse
-
I don't find her anyway near as attractive as she seems to think she is.
Leave a comment:
-
never found her attractive actually. Perhaps a lack of curves...legs are nice though.
Leave a comment:
-
Nope. She nearly died a few months back after an ectopic pregnancy ruptured.Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostDoes she have a daughter?
She's nearly 40, but she does have a certain something about her. On balance, I'd say I would. But only because she's famous.
Leave a comment:
-
Should be entitled:Originally posted by NickFitz View PostA more pertinent question: would she?
Probably not, therefore the point isn't even moot
Suzi Perry - (If given the chance) would you?
But i think the contents of the brackets are generally implied
Anyway, thread needs pics before being shunted off to LR
http://www.newsgab.com/forum/attachm...i-03040902.jpg
Probably NSFW
Leave a comment:
-
A more pertinent question: would she?
Probably not, therefore the point isn't even moot
Leave a comment:
-
I am in general agreement with youOriginally posted by stingman123 View Postjust watched the gadget show tonight, Suzi Perry? MMMMmmmmmmmmmm
She was looking rather hot...
I didn't see tonights gadget show, will have to catch the repeat
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Leave a comment: