• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "1% of people in Britain have 70% of the country's wealth"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Much of the disparity is a residual effect of William the Conqueror's monkeysphere

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Thats the one
    I should remember it, I've had to build pareto reports a few times in the past

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    The 20:80 ratio of 20% of the population owning 80% of the wealth has been around for centuries.
    Pareto Principle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by rootsnall View Post
    The 1% must be very pleased with themselves.

    I think a good chunk of that 1% will have descended from landed gentry, so they have done a particularly good job to have preserved and then expanded their share of the pot.

    Yes, and much of the land taken away from the common folk and given to the Gentry. This practice still existed in the 1920s and 30s until the 50s Huge chunks of common land were given away as rewards. The land became very valuable building land from the 1950s onwards. People were evicted from there former homes on former common land in the 1950s when the land came into private ownership.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    The 20:80 ratio of 20% of the population owning 80% of the wealth has been around for centuries.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The rich are not stupid. Who would want to own a majority of Australia. Most of it is snake and crocodile infested swampland, and the rest is made up of a few crummy houses surrounded by tin fences.
    it's mostly desert you fool.

    1% of the country is worth having, and its occupied by 70% of the people


    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Who would want to own a majority of Australia?
    King George III

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    This would never have happened under the tories.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Most of Australia is swampland? Bloody hell! this climate change is sure hitting hard. Sounds like heaven anyway, miles of wilderness full of nice little snake and spiders, no stinky people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Eat the Rich

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance...g-world-level/

    According to consultants AT Kearney, the richest 1pc in the UK hold some 70pc of the country’s wealth. That there is this divide between rich and poor is not exactly new – but the scale of it, and the likelihood that it is not being narrowed by the financial crisis, is a big worry. Indeed, according to the report, in the US the amount of financial assets owned by the richest 1pc in the US is far, far lower at 48pc, and only 34pc in Australia.


    Not a lot of people know that.
    The rich are not stupid. Who would want to own a majority of Australia. Most of it is snake and crocodile infested swampland, and the rest is made up of a few crummy houses surrounded by tin fences.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    It's only fair...

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I bet a very high proportion ( 30%->40% of adults maybe ) have next to no money at all. Enough to get them through to the end of the month. No savings, no equity no pension.

    Of course, it will be that group that will complain the most about this.
    Well compared to the rest of europe, 30-40% who can manage to get to the end of the month is actually a good score. In many EU countries a large majority of people can't make it after the 3rd week of the month.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    According to consultants AT Kearney, the richest 1pc in the UK hold some 70pc of the country’s wealth. That there is this divide between rich and poor is not exactly new – but the scale of it, and the likelihood that it is not being narrowed by the financial crisis, is a big worry. Indeed, according to the report, in the US the amount of financial assets owned by the richest 1pc in the US is far, far lower at 48pc, and only 34pc in Australia.
    Bloody contractors, this all started under the Tories

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I bet a very high proportion ( 30%->40% of adults maybe ) have next to no money at all. Enough to get them through to the end of the month. No savings, no equity no pension.

    Of course, it will be that group that will complain the most about this.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X