• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Has CGI ruined cinema?"

Collapse

  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Where's it heading? How much more unrealism can you pack in before it gets silly? What are action films 20 years hence going to be like? 3D and total visual immersion maybe. Speaking of which, I've got my 3D specs ready for channel 4 3D week next week.
    They've run out in Sainsbury's

    Anyone know where I can track down a couple of pairs?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Where's it heading? How much more unrealism can you pack in before it gets silly? What are action films 20 years hence going to be like? 3D and total visual immersion maybe. Speaking of which, I've got my 3D specs ready for channel 4 3D week next week.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Terrible, why they have to ham them up and make them almost comedies.

    Unrealism in films is hardly new though. How often do we see murder or manslaughter cases where somebody died from one punch? Yet big blokes like John Wayne etc would knock each other about for 5 minutes, roll down cliffs, fall of off balconies, get hit over the head with chairs and emerge with a thin trickle of blood on one corner of their handsome mouths.

    I'm amazed nobody has used it in a defence. I had no idea blowing someone through a plate glass window with a hand grenade was dangerous, mlud, it never hurt Bruce Willis.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by norrahe View Post
    Come back Ray Harryhausen all is forgiven
    Now you're talking. That Talos was terrifying to a young lad.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I caught the last Die Hard on TV the other week, Was expecting some mindless nonesense that would be mildly entertaining. In the previous films, they were a bit daft but within the realms of possibility. Many of the films relying on stunt men with a few special effects. However, the latest film used so much CGI it was almost like watching a Tom and Jerry cartoon. It seems Mr Willis doesn't die hard these days more that he is an indestructable super human. He can jump onto a fighter Jet and jump off as it's crashing, he can get alsorts of heavy machinery thrown at him and remain unscathed.


    There was this one time, I was flying my fighter with some food on my lap, and this idiot right, well, he just came out of nowhere



    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    The Missus & I sat through John le Carré's "The Spy Who Came in from the Cold" in July and were utterly engrossed.

    Sat there in silence, staring immobile into the middle distance; the imagery was fantastic. The encounters, the court room scenes, the events at the Berlin Wall: fantastic stuff.

    But that was radio where the pictures are always better.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
    Cr@p adaptation of a good book. Cuts loads out from the book, to include a load of irrelevant stuff that adds nothing to the story (or else it would have been in the book).

    Better than Order of the Phoenix, though, which is a cr@p adaptation of a cr@p book.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    True it's been a fairly pants year for film, but I did enjoy Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince which has heaps of CGI, but it fits well.

    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    If the CGI is applied in the right way and hidden enough so it's not glaringly obvious, then it's not so bad.

    Come back Ray Harryhausen all is forgiven

    And to add to bad plot and p!ss poor acting wall of fame the latest tripe from the indiana jones stable.

    And yes, it has been a poor year for film.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Didn't the last Bond film go back to non-CGI basics? With stunt men, special effects and all that?

    If so it had some great parkour, and I'd enjoy that more than actors running about on empty blue sets.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    I refer the honourable lady to the reply I gave some moments ago.
    Ooh! Get 'er

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Zippy View Post
    No, I wouldn't say it has.
    The problem with the last Star Wars film was a dodgy plot and piss-poor acting.
    I refer the honourable lady to the reply I gave some moments ago.

    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    FWIW, the last Star Wars was a cartoon. They generally have a lot of CGI in them these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    No, I wouldn't say it has.
    The problem with the last Star Wars film was a dodgy plot and piss-poor acting.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    As ever, poor application of technology is no answer to the problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    The last star wars was a bit of a joke, sure you got to see full landscapes of futuristic alien cities but so many scenes would have been 2 actors running around on a blue set, I kind of think the actors lost the sense of context and it showed.
    FWIW, the last Star Wars was a cartoon. They generally have a lot of CGI in them these days.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X