Originally posted by BlasterBates
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IMF: UK faces credit rationing
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IMF: UK faces credit rationing"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostOne of my testers is working on securitisations right now; coming from a techie background he didn't understand anything about it, so I arranged for him to have some coaching sessions from the head of securitisation. Unfortunately, he doesn't understand much of it either and now I have the bank's securitisation department phoning my tester every day asking him questions about it. Does anybody really grasp securitisation?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostCan anyone explain what real-life implications this would have?
In general bond issuers or other lenders in the UK would have to pay more interest in order to get funding.
If it gets really bad you get cut off from normal international lending markets.
That will force the government to spend less than they bring in - quickly! That is painful for normal citizens as unemployment benefits and healcare is cut away.
Think Zimbabwe.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostCan anyone explain what real-life implications this would have?
BOOMED, theoretically, for me
ps, actually I don´t have a clue as all I do know is that these credit risk programs are actually in many cases more like an automated Mystic Meg and not even the designers or developers have a bleeding clue what they do.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 30 September 2009, 16:18.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostIs that all - I could even dispense with the walk as I could make my own 'gold'
- Sell a share from the seller to the buyer
don't dis them
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View PostI'll explain it:
- You take a steaming turd.
- You but it in a gold coloured box.
- You put a red ribbon outside the box.
- You attach a card where you write "Precious golden gift".
- You sell this precious thing to an idiot who intends to sell it on to another idiot for a profit, so your customer does not look into the box to verify that he has bought a "Precious Golden Gift".
- You pocket the money from your customer and spend it on bonus for the seller of the product (yourself) and on buying more boxed, ribbons and cards.
- Then you take a walk in the park in search of more "gold".
Is that all - I could even dispense with the walk as I could make my own 'gold'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostOne of my testers is working on securitisations right now; coming from a techie background he didn't understand anything about it, so I arranged for him to have some coaching sessions from the head of securitisation. Unfortunately, he doesn't understand much of it either and now I have the bank's securitisation department phoning my tester every day asking him questions about it. Does anybody really grasp securitisation?
- You take a steaming turd.
- You but it in a gold coloured box.
- You put a red ribbon outside the box.
- You attach a card where you write "Precious golden gift".
- You sell this precious thing to an idiot who intends to sell it on to another idiot for a profit, so your customer does not look into the box to verify that he has bought a "Precious Golden Gift".
- You pocket the money from your customer and spend it on bonus for the seller of the product (yourself) and on buying more boxed, ribbons and cards.
- Then you take a walk in the park in search of more "gold".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostDoes anybody really grasp securitisation?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostGood point, although they're reasonably good at country risk (just sh!t at securitisations)
Leave a comment:
-
I've had a genius idea. We just print enough money to pay off all our debts
Leave a comment:
-
Bend over fellas. Shaft is coming to town and guess what he is going to do to you.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: