• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Rain tax

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Rain tax"

Collapse

  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    500 dollars.
    poor you, I am sorry to hear you have fallen on hard times.
    If you give me your bank details I will send you my pocket change.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Scary View Post
    I was reading a comment on an El Reg article about rain ownership today

    Brian Miller Posted Monday 28th September 2009 14:44 GMT

    There is a lot of rain water coming down that is simply let go. In Seattle, the government "owns" all the rain. Seriously, it is the law here. (could be a county ordinance, not sure) Anyways, if you catch rain water, doing so is illegal, and all due punishment will apply.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09...gear/comments/

    Sounds crazy if true.
    Many years ago and before water boards were privatised, a schoolmate's father tried generating electricity from a stream running through his land. The water board concerned wanted to charge him for using "their" water. They wanted so much that he ripped the equipment out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scary
    replied
    I was reading a comment on an El Reg article about rain ownership today

    Brian Miller Posted Monday 28th September 2009 14:44 GMT

    There is a lot of rain water coming down that is simply let go. In Seattle, the government "owns" all the rain. Seriously, it is the law here. (could be a county ordinance, not sure) Anyways, if you catch rain water, doing so is illegal, and all due punishment will apply.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09...gear/comments/

    Sounds crazy if true.

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
    So, despite my performing apparently conscious acts..
    it is that you are consciously acting in an uncharitable way that inclines people to believe that you are trying to provoke a reaction and thus are in fact the imaginary friend of a fiend.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    1. You don't seem to know what a sockpuppet is.
    2. You don't recognise that the use of "fairness", implies irony
    3. You don't recognise irony.

    Therefore, you are either a septic, or a sockpuppet.

    But if you're really not a sock puppet, don't take it to heart - just remember not take everything at face value.
    Last edited by NotAllThere; 29 September 2009, 12:08.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarquin Farquhar
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    That would presume a real person - not one that's been made up.
    So, despite my performing apparently conscious acts, you assert that I do not exist? What does that mean? Cogito, ergo sum.

    "Does BIG BROTHER exist?" (asked Winston Smith)

    "Of course he exists." (said O'Brien)

    "Does he exist in the same way as I exist?"

    "You do not exist," said O'Brien.
    I admit that I am not using my real name. Is that a problem, Mr (or Ms) NotAllThere?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
    Another argumentum ad hominem.
    That would presume a real person - not one that's been made up.

    Leave a comment:


  • sweetandsour
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
    But the water company is not the local community, it's a business;
    Back in the day, the provision of clean water was pursued for the public good.

    The lack of it had previously been the cause of quite a high number of deaths as people moved from the countryside to the cities during the Industrial Revolution .....

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarquin Farquhar
    replied
    Originally posted by DS23 View Post
    are these charities using the water that falls on their roofs?
    No. That's why they have to pay for the drainage that takes it away.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    So DP is outraged at the way the privatised water companies have been charging excessively for drainage, and therefore presumably is in favour of the Government's intention to force those companies to charge more fairly?

    DP praise for NL - wonders will never cease

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    but is it not being found that a lot of surface drainage does not actually hit the drains - and although many people have been charged by their water companies for it over the past 20 years you will only be offered a refund on the past year?

    but yes it is not a tax but a charge for a service so not really the numpty labores fault.

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
    Another argumentum ad hominem.
    are these charities using the water that falls on their roofs?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Another end of month.

    Kerching!

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackenedBiker View Post
    another dollar
    500 dollars.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackenedBiker
    replied
    another dollar

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X