• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "HAB proves his incompetence once again"

Collapse

  • DS23
    replied
    fatalism eh. wherever, whenever, however, whoever, whatever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    I wouldn't worry HAB, it doesn't matter anyway.

    In fact, 99% of the work that is done doesn't really matter either. It's just that some people put a notional value on it and then think it's important.

    Eg, let's suppose that you are writing and supporting code for the Stock Exchange. Now imagine it goes all wrong and the Worldwide Market crashes.

    Sure, that's a lot of fallout, but in the end, the world will still keep on turning, and we'll find ways to get around it anyway.

    I was going to say excluding control systems for things like Nuclear Reactors, but then again, if they go a bit whoopsie then once you deal with the mess, the world will continue spinning (not necessarily with electricity, but we managed without it for a good few millenia).

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    I thought I had things covered. I was trying to be so professional. I have a job that runs every day that backs up all my databases. All was good in the world.

    Except, I want to take a copy of my reference data / time series database onto my workstation and when I look for the backup of the database – it’s only 2 Mb! I’ve been backing up the wrong database for five months. I migrated to a new schema, but didn’t change the backup job which carried on doing the old database.


    I really shouldn’t be let out alone. I’m going to do some serious damage one of these days.
    The main point is ClientCo didn't get to find out so no harm done. Just work out a scenario where you can blame someone else in the event that they actually want a back up older than the previous 10 hours...

    Your secret's safe with us, HAB...

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    there's a package that prevents incompetence? and 80uu has it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    We all do it. The other day I copied a file, did some mods and resaved only to find original overwritten. I'd actually just coped a shortcut.
    Pros use FAR Manager - good Norton Commander clone for 32 bit Windows Console.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    We all do it. The other day I copied a file, did some mods and resaved only to find original overwritten. I'd actually just coped a shortcut.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    HAB proves his incompetence once again

    HAB proves his incompetence once again
    You don't have to prove a thing to us, old friend!

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    started a topic HAB proves his incompetence once again

    HAB proves his incompetence once again

    I thought I had things covered. I was trying to be so professional. I have a job that runs every day that backs up all my databases. All was good in the world.

    Except, I want to take a copy of my reference data / time series database onto my workstation and when I look for the backup of the database – it’s only 2 Mb! I’ve been backing up the wrong database for five months. I migrated to a new schema, but didn’t change the backup job which carried on doing the old database.


    I really shouldn’t be let out alone. I’m going to do some serious damage one of these days.

Working...
X