• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Betrayed

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Betrayed"

Collapse

  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    OMG, I've just realised I sound like CyberIdiot.


    LOL

    Looks like you are more qualified than me, probably not infinitely though....

    So I don't think you'll argue that a proper hacker would not have been caught.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Those who are mentaly incapacitated are not capable of making rational decisions nor understanding consequences. Where you and I understand the difference between right and wrong and choose our actions they do not. They simply do not "commit" crimes.

    Prison is no place for them. Those who are inept are targets for bullying and manipulation of the worst sorts and those who are violent are a threat to other inmates and officers alike and they are a threat to the peaceful running of the prison.

    There are very few prison officers trained to look after the mentaly ill, let alone care for them.

    We need more institutions to cope with these people. Prison is not the answer.


    I'm referring to those that develop mental problems while serving a sentence. DOH!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    I agree, but they are better to be alive and run that risk than suffer the dreadful death that their victims did. It's part of the sentence as far as I am concerned. Don't do the crime and you won't need to do the time.

    Those who are mentaly incapacitated are not capable of making rational decisions nor understanding consequences. Where you and I understand the difference between right and wrong and choose our actions they do not. They simply do not "commit" crimes.

    Prison is no place for them. Those who are inept are targets for bullying and manipulation of the worst sorts and those who are violent are a threat to other inmates and officers alike and they are a threat to the peaceful running of the prison.

    There are very few prison officers trained to look after the mentaly ill, let alone care for them.

    We need more institutions to cope with these people. Prison is not the answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by JamieMoles View Post
    Actually prisons create alot of mental illness and don't have the facilities to treat in most cases....


    I agree, but they are better to be alive and run that risk than suffer the dreadful death that their victims did. It's part of the sentence as far as I am concerned. Don't do the crime and you won't need to do the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamieMoles
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    I bet there's lots of mentally ill people in prisons. It's one of the best places for them IMO, bearing in mind the lack of suitable facilities elsewhere.
    Actually prisons create alot of mental illness and don't have the facilities to treat in most cases....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Crosby
    replied
    Hang him.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Until it is ratified by Congress and not a one sided arrangement this treaty should be ignored. Except when it suits us, Abu Hamza etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    OMG, I've just realised I sound like CyberIdiot.

    No, the nice thing is that no matter how bad you get, you never get that bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Who cares !! Why should we try to protect our criminals. We are too damn soft. The US can have all of our murderers and execute the lot of them as far as I am concerned. Then we might have a deterrent at last !!
    OMG, I've just realised I sound like CyberIdiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    However, it must be observed that the Septics have never ratified their part of the treaty, so this is entirely one way.

    From the UK to the US...

    You can imagine the fuss if we tried to extradite a Septic under similar circumstances.


    Who cares !! Why should we try to protect our criminals. We are too damn soft. The US can have all of our murderers and execute the lot of them as far as I am concerned. Then we might have a deterrent at last !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    We should apply the Golden Rule to them, and do as they would do unto us.
    Ahhh, good old W100. I remember that module well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Two wrongs don't make a right.

    I think it's pretty disgusting that your country will allow you to be extradited to another country without any evidence being presented to a court in your own country.
    I'm not commenting on the ethics behind it, just purely the law.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Do you even work in IT?
    I guarantee you I am infinitely more qualified than you to discuss this subject considering I work in the 'industry.' I'm a member of the security architecture board for my product specialisation. Why are you so qualified on the subject?

    This guy targeted private infrastructure in the US and piggybacked off them to attack US state IT infrastructure. He clearly knew what he was doing and attempted to hide his trail. This wasn't a guy being bored and deciding to do a sniff on the internet.
    Last edited by Incognito; 20 July 2009, 19:44. Reason: Removing stuff

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Brings back memories of Comecon when the septics said you can't sell computers to East European countries otherwise you'll be put in prison, in the USA, sod which country you come from.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    The UK also has an agreement with Canada, Australia and New Zealand regarding reciprocal agreements which means that the UK doesn't have to present any evidence with the request.
    Two wrongs don't make a right.

    I think it's pretty disgusting that your country will allow you to be extradited to another country without any evidence being presented to a court in your own country.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X