- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Cybermans Ignore List
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Cybermans Ignore List"
Collapse
-
CyberTwunt is more to be pitied than mocked. It must be hard to be a conservative Tory old queen. It probably accounts for why he can hold several conflicting opinions none of which make any sense.
-
He called me a plonker when I pointed out some holes in his facts/logic on one of the aircrash threads. I must declare an interest - I am fascinated by air disasters - but from an engineering and human causal factors perspective rather than rubbernecking at dead and injured people
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreenerGrass View PostI'm with Xoggoth. I love reading Cyberman's posts, often when he's right people will still argue just to try and put him down, and when he's not right it's still funny.
The best thing is he doesn't appear to give a toss what any of you think.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm with Xoggoth. I love reading Cyberman's posts, often when he's right people will still argue just to try and put him down, and when he's not right it's still funny.
The best thing is he doesn't appear to give a toss what any of you think.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostPerhaps I don't read a lot a lot of Cyberman's posts because my impression of him has been that in the main he responds politely to criticism and personal attacks.
He is nasty and vile. His obscene use of laughing smilies after mentioning some tragedy or other makes me feel sick.
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostI did put him on ignore but people always quote the bugger.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostHe comes out with wild statements, cliches and sterotypes yet does little to back up his assertions. He repeats said cliches. over and over and over and over again ad infinitum. It's either a form of brainwashing or he has stupidity tourettes. Most people on here will attempt to back up their aguments, unless they are trolling. I thought he was a troll or a sockpuppet, but it long ago ceased to be funny.
He seems to have an aviation disaster fetish which serves him with endless entertainment. That is just weird!
He NEVER addresses counter arguments, he lives in a very black and white world where everything has it's box.
I can appreciate some people might like him because his views are 'safe' simple stereotypes based on anecdotal evidence with mild racist undertones. A very simple, unscientific and introspective way of thinking and long a tradition on this board.
But if people don't like him why not just put him on ignore? The only problem you then have is people quoting him. Harping on about him will only inflate his ego.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snaw View PostNah, I have - stuff that is demonstratably wrong. Factual type stuff, plenty of it.Originally posted by Homer SimpsonFacts? You can prove anything that's even remotely true with facts
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostCyberTwunt's "arguments" consist of making unsupported (by data) assertions and then repeating them ad infinitum. It is this MO that justifiably hacks people off.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
He comes out with wild statements, cliches and sterotypes yet does little to back up his assertions. He repeats said cliches. over and over and over and over again ad infinitum. It's either a form of brainwashing or he has stupidity tourettes. Most people on here will attempt to back up their aguments, unless they are trolling. I thought he was a troll or a sockpuppet, but it long ago ceased to be funny.
He seems to have an aviation disaster fetish which serves him with endless entertainment. That is just weird!
He NEVER addresses counter arguments, he lives in a very black and white world where everything has it's box.
I can appreciate some people might like him because his views are 'safe' simple stereotypes based on anecdotal evidence with mild racist undertones. A very simple, unscientific and introspective way of thinking and long a tradition on this board.
Leave a comment:
-
I enjoy baiting him and pointing out the contrary view to his. I think he is badly misguided about many things but he's not always plain wrong in the same way he would say I always am. I even agree with him occasionally. His ridiculous blinkered Tory dogma is highly amusing, more so when he denies it and then offers repeated conclusive proof of it.
Leave a comment:
-
Second Timber Wolf on most of that, on this thread anyway. Laughing at other's misfortunes? Missed those. Terrible, unless it was Labour MPs obviously. Labour MPs being beaten to death, set on fire and dissolved in acid (in any order) would be hilarious.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI don't recall seeing him being proved wrong. People usually argue about things that don't have a right of wrong, are too complex to have a right or wrong or are just a matter of opinion.
edit - anyway, pointless conversation. You either have, or haven't. Plenty here have and I'm kinda over talking about him, he's not really worth spending minutes of my day discussing, so given I'm on his ignore list I think I'll now call it a day on himLast edited by snaw; 1 July 2009, 20:45.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by snaw View PostVery polite that one.
Read many of his laughing at others misfortune posts? The not so funny kind of laughig ones?
Or innumerable posts where he makes wild statements of fact, gets proved wrong then completely ignores it?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: