Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: If anybody asks you...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "If anybody asks you..."
Collapse
-
The investors in question were the pension fund managers and other investment managers who didn't want to take risks with their clients money.Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Postso its greenspan's fault - he would only give investor's a 1% return? and investors could not buy equities because? or they could not invest in solar power, wind power, fuel efficiency schemes etc etc etc?
what kind of investors are these people who can only see treasury bills ($$$$)???
Treasury bills are a risk free AAA investment, but at 1% made the returns extremely unattractive. So poor that the funds would have actually lost money on them by the time inflation is taken into account.
The CDO's offered by the banks were also supposed to be AAA rated investments but offering a 4% return, so the investors bought them in huge quantities. It all went down hill from there.
Leave a comment:
-
solar power is new-fangled?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostIt's all about the risk - investors don't like risky new-fangled solar power.
Leave a comment:
-
It's all about the risk - investors don't like risky new-fangled solar power.Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Postso its greenspan's fault - he would only give investor's a 1% return? and investors could not buy equities because? or they could not invest in solar power, wind power, fuel efficiency schemes etc etc etc?
what kind of investors are these people who can only see treasury bills ($$$$)???
They like high-risk packaged as low risk even less, but that's a different point.
Leave a comment:
-
so its greenspan's fault - he would only give investor's a 1% return? and investors could not buy equities because? or they could not invest in solar power, wind power, fuel efficiency schemes etc etc etc?
what kind of investors are these people who can only see treasury bills ($$$$)???
Leave a comment:
-
It a very good video : though I have an even better powerpoint slide.
Leave a comment:
-
I told anyone who would listen this bubble would burst dramatically, when house prices started going balistic (early 00s), and people would laugh, and go obout supply and demand etc. It was obvious the rises were caused by little more than the supply of cheap money and the likes of self cert 125% motgages! People were blinded by their own greed, the whole market acted stupidly, with little concern for value or common see. All bubbles end in disaster, this one even managing to bring down the financial system, was nobody looking at the potential downside?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Excellent thanks.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post.. why the credit crunch happened, point them here.
http://Crisisofcredit.com/
It's so simple, even my wife understands it now.
Leave a comment:
-
If anybody asks you...
.. why the credit crunch happened, point them here.
http://Crisisofcredit.com/
It's so simple, even my wife understands it now.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Leave a comment: