• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Yet another reason...."

Collapse

  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Amazing; you're answering your own post. You'll be arguing with yourself next.
    Well, I get more sense out of myself than the likes you tester folks !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Pickle2 View Post
    No but it disproves your point that religion = muslim always means babys = many.

    Then explain why they have 3.5 per family in the UK. Could it be the advantages of our benefits system, perhaps ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why is Iran so low? There must be a good reason but I can't see it. I am obviously thick.....

    I was reading an article on Iran a while back. The consensus was that people in Iran are so pessimistic over the future that they avoid bringing children into the world. I actually see the UK going this way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    No I won't!



    oops, wrong login
    classic

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Amazing; you're answering your own post. You'll be arguing with yourself next.
    No I won't!



    oops, wrong login

    Leave a comment:


  • Pickle2
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    ... which proves nothing
    No but it disproves your point that religion = muslim always means babys = many.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why is Iran so low? There must be a good reason but I can't see it. I am obviously thick.....
    Highly urbanised population, well educated women and a strong female workforce. I know, it doesn’t fit with western prejudices about Iran, but let’s not judge Iranians by their Mullahs. Basically, those three factors play a very big role in determining birth rates. A case in point is the Indian state of Kerala, where birth rates have fallen rapidly after the state government introduced compulsory education for all girls.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    You only have to look at the voting in the European Song Contest to see muslim democracy at work !!
    Amazing; you're answering your own post. You'll be arguing with yourself next.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    No, he was always clawing a rebate back.

    IGMC.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Pickle2 View Post
    Fyi - Some Fertility rates by country.

    Fertility rate
    in 2008
    (births/woman)


    World Average 2.61

    New Zealnd 2.11

    USA 2.1

    France 1.89

    Turkey 1.87

    Iran 1.71

    Why is Iran so low? There must be a good reason but I can't see it. I am obviously thick.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    No, he was always clawing a rebate back.

    IGMC.

    Good one!!!!

    Tell a few more like that and I could be hooked on your sense of humour !!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    That Abul Hamza was a good taxpayer wasn't he !!!
    No, he was always clawing a rebate back.

    IGMC.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Solidec View Post
    I couln't care less what the Birth Rate for muslims in Britain is, as long as they are of the tax paying wealth creating sort.

    Much more preferable than the Benefits wasters and their birthrate of half a dozen!

    TYou sure you won't be voting BNP next year CyberZzzzory

    That Abul Hamza was a good taxpayer wasn't he !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Pickle2 View Post
    Fyi - Some Fertility rates by country.

    Fertility rate
    in 2008
    (births/woman)


    World Average 2.61

    New Zealnd 2.11

    USA 2.1

    France 1.89

    Turkey 1.87

    Iran 1.71


    ... which proves nothing

    Leave a comment:


  • Solidec
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    What rubbish. The birth rate is 3.5 in the UK compared with .9 for Brits.
    I couln't care less what the Birth Rate for muslims in Britain is, as long as they are of the tax paying wealth creating sort.

    Much more preferable than the Benefits wasters and their birthrate of half a dozen!

    TYou sure you won't be voting BNP next year CyberZzzzory

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X