• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IWF comes to its senses"

Collapse

  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    As another poster once said: it's all been downhill since ftp and gopher. Paradoxically maybe we'll look back one day and see the appalling mess of a protocol 'http' was one of the biggest stumbling blocks.
    ftp, gopher (and indeed archie) and email are the internet. This "web" thing is potentially a good idea though, and might be useful if it gets properly developed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    As another poster once said: it's all been downhill since ftp and gopher. Paradoxically maybe we'll look back one day and see the appalling mess of a protocol 'http' was one of the biggest stumbling blocks.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The Internet Watch Foundation has lifted its ban on The Scorpions' Virgin Killer album cover on Wikipedia:
    The IWF now says that given the age and availability of the image, it was no longer on its list of proscribed sites.

    EDIT: They also admit to the magnitude of their fail:
    The IWF admitted that its attempts to prevent people seeing the image had been counter productive.

    "IWF's overriding objective is to minimise the availability of indecent images of children on the internet, however, on this occasion our efforts have had the opposite effect. We regret the unintended consequences for Wikipedia and its users."

    Perhaps they should learn something about how their own activities can directly influence users of the Internet before they set themselves up as being entitled to "Watch" it on our behalf.

    At the moment, they seem to be treating the World Wide Web as something that can be controlled by such means as might be used against a local video store selling under-the-counter stuff.

    Useless twonks
    And few people would have looked if not for their misguided actions.

    Its FRankie goes to Hollywood all over again.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    SFW I think
    I think that definitely depends on where you work... Nuts magazine => OK, popular music radio station => probably OK, merchant bank => free bin liner and muscular (male) escort to the door

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Maybe now they can turn their attention to this highly offensive image.

    SFW I think

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    started a topic IWF comes to its senses

    IWF comes to its senses

    The Internet Watch Foundation has lifted its ban on The Scorpions' Virgin Killer album cover on Wikipedia:
    The IWF now says that given the age and availability of the image, it was no longer on its list of proscribed sites.

    EDIT: They also admit to the magnitude of their fail:
    The IWF admitted that its attempts to prevent people seeing the image had been counter productive.

    "IWF's overriding objective is to minimise the availability of indecent images of children on the internet, however, on this occasion our efforts have had the opposite effect. We regret the unintended consequences for Wikipedia and its users."

    Perhaps they should learn something about how their own activities can directly influence users of the Internet before they set themselves up as being entitled to "Watch" it on our behalf.

    At the moment, they seem to be treating the World Wide Web as something that can be controlled by such means as might be used against a local video store selling under-the-counter stuff.

    Useless twonks
    Last edited by NickFitz; 10 December 2008, 01:35.

Working...
X