• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Shannon Mathews endgame?"

Collapse

  • PAH
    replied
    This case goes some way to proving that people should have to earn the right to be parents.

    Being a parent is the most responsible duty a human can have, yet it requires the least amount of education or qualification that the parents are fit for the role, either mentally, emotionally, or financially.

    For every case the social services deal with correctly, there are many that are mishandled, or missed altogether. It's just not working.

    I say they should develop a contraception that's given to girls before they become sexually active and can't be removed until a whole raft of critera has been met. With the planet getting more and more overpopulated it's either this or another world war.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by deano View Post
    I don't think the feelings that Karen Matthew's plan has stirred up are particularly middle-class. I think that there are just as many people shocked from other classes, upper-, lower- and under-.

    What she did was wrong in anyone's eyes, no matter what you read; The Times, The Daily Mail, The Sun or Class War.

    It's no good trying to provide a class-based explanation for her actions, when one doesn't exist, in order to then provoke a debate about capitalism, education and wealth-redistribution, which is what some left-wing apologists will no doubt be attempting.

    The "Oh Dear" reaction is the right one. The words that are used may not be "Oh dear", depending upon your own education and background, but that is merely the displayed result of the common reaction that has taken place within any right-thinking individual.

    It also seems to me, that to dismiss an argument from the middle-classes (whatever they are these days) as "pseudo-intellectual", and therefore worth less than one from some other class is a little arrogant.
    That's what I said here...

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Drugging your kid is normal? Probably. Doesn't make it right.
    My point exactly. Everyone getting all fired up about this one case when the reality is most of the individual parts are 'normal', the only thing of note here is the confluence.

    Do people blockade Boots to stop them selling massive amounts of these over-the-counter 'cough' medicines? Not really.

    So why all the hand wringing?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    It all sounds normal to me.

    When I were t'lad , fatha used to come back from t'pub
    tie me up wit washin line
    an Mutha would stuff me under t'bed an call t'cops.
    Then we'd go ta Butlins wi reward money
    an do it all agin next week.





    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    My point is that is what normal is. You lot, with your 'oh dears', trying to impress your nuveau riche pseudo intellectual victorian middle class values on such a situation is mockingly absurd.
    Drugging your kid is normal? Probably. Doesn't make it right.

    Leave a comment:


  • deano
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    My point is that is what normal is. You lot, with your 'oh dears', trying to impress your nuveau riche pseudo intellectual victorian middle class values on such a situation is mockingly absurd.
    I don't think the feelings that Karen Matthew's plan has stirred up are particularly middle-class. I think that there are just as many people shocked from other classes, upper-, lower- and under-.

    What she did was wrong in anyone's eyes, no matter what you read; The Times, The Daily Mail, The Sun or Class War.

    It's no good trying to provide a class-based explanation for her actions, when one doesn't exist, in order to then provoke a debate about capitalism, education and wealth-redistribution, which is what some left-wing apologists will no doubt be attempting.

    The "Oh Dear" reaction is the right one. The words that are used may not be "Oh dear", depending upon your own education and background, but that is merely the displayed result of the common reaction that has taken place within any right-thinking individual.

    It also seems to me, that to dismiss an argument from the middle-classes (whatever they are these days) as "pseudo-intellectual", and therefore worth less than one from some other class is a little arrogant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ravello
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    My point is that is what normal is. You lot, with your 'oh dears', trying to impress your nuveau riche pseudo intellectual victorian middle class values on such a situation is mockingly absurd.
    nouveau

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    My point is that is what normal is. You lot, with your 'oh dears', trying to impress your nuveau riche pseudo intellectual victorian middle class values on such a situation is mockingly absurd.
    Agreed that normalcy is only a relative value, hence using terms like 'better'. By better I mean more stable, less likely to be tied up, that sort of thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    My point is that is what normal is. You lot, with your 'oh dears', trying to impress your nuveau riche pseudo intellectual victorian middle class values on such a situation is mockingly absurd.
    For a dalek - you are full of shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    karen matthews is a fick and ugly chav innit.

    Here endeth the lesson...
    My point is that is what normal is. You lot, with your 'oh dears', trying to impress your nuveau riche pseudo intellectual victorian middle class values on such a situation is mockingly absurd.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    karen matthews is a fick and ugly chav innit.

    Here endeth the lesson...

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    You don't think her whole childhood is going to be monitored with such extreme interest by an entire army of council social workers that it's going to produce it's own harm, that may well be even worse. One must realise that in the initial situation her life was more or less 'normal'...
    Anything has to be better than being raised by those dangerous half-wits.
    Having said that - she's lucky they didn't have the brains to be dangerous and think the situation through to its logical conclusion once they'd started this. Otherwise they might have entertained other options.

    Social security will find a distant relative or foster family to care for her, she'll be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by realityhack View Post
    It's all for the best really. It's Sharon Matthews' best and only real chance of escaping into (potentially) a normal life with relatively better prospects. In fact, there are orphanages in Zimbabwe that would give her a better upbringing.
    You don't think her whole childhood is going to be monitored with such extreme interest by an entire army of council social workers that it's going to produce it's own harm, that may well be even worse. One must realise that in the initial situation her life was more or less 'normal'...

    Leave a comment:


  • zara_backdog
    replied
    On the radio it said that the children were on the child protection register for a while and then taken off. Looks like another investigtion here.....

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    It's all for the best really. It's Sharon Matthews' best and only real chance of escaping into (potentially) a normal life with relatively better prospects. In fact, there are orphanages in Zimbabwe that would give her a better upbringing.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X