• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "SallyAnne's Invidious Scheme"

Collapse

  • Tensai
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Do besides xxx - we should not say nuclear either? or bomb? or terrorist? anything else I missed?
    Cocaine?

    Actually, that would probably get fast-tracked if you work in the City.

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    lucy?

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    norks?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Do besides xxx - we should not say nuclear either? or bomb? or terrorist? anything else I missed?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Agreed

    xxxx

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    BTW, SA, you should probably stop doing it, as it will result in people having to explain to their clients why they were accessing a page with thricefold-"x" material on it... they might get away with it if it was naughty pictures, but they won't get away with admitting to reading General
    Last edited by NickFitz; 29 October 2008, 05:00. Reason: Oops, did it myself :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    started a topic SallyAnne's Invidious Scheme

    SallyAnne's Invidious Scheme

    I noticed yesterday that SallyAnne (Whom God Preserve) has started appending some of her posts with three "x" characters, doubtless intended to act as kisses (and probably ironic in intent).

    There was such a post on the Stonehenge thread, and prior to that on the Rissole Twonk thread.

    However, it transpires that the presence of the three contiguous "x" characters is triggering the (clearly shoddy and useless) Internet-filtering software used by some people's ClientCorps, and possibly rendering said people liable to questioning by their clients concerning their attempts to access supposedly questionable content

    Given that, whenever SallyAnne puts these three consecutive characters on her posts, it renders the relevant page of such a thread (and any subsequent page where her post is quoted) off-limits to these people, this clearly constitutes a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack.

    So, as SallyAnne's name is usually abbreviated to SA, I would like to christen this activity: "The SADDoS Attack"

Working...
X