• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Master of the bleeding obvious."

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Only 99%?
    are you sure? I think you should go and read through everything ever posted and get your facts straight
    will do! I will start with tpd! I will report back in 3.5 years......

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    That's a fact.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    We should definetly say nothing until ALL facts are known! Thats the end of 99% of posts to cuk then....
    Only 99%?
    are you sure? I think you should go and read through everything ever posted and get your facts straight

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Well I dont know. I find it very hard to be serious on an internet forum ....


    but


    you raise an in interesting point that I have been thinking about lately. Sometimes you have to do stuff when you dont have all the facts, should you let this paralyse you ?should you not speak unless you know ALL the background ?


    hic



    We should definetly say nothing until ALL facts are known! Thats the end of 99% of posts to cuk then....

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Or if she had taken care of business? Its very hard to tell without knowing all the facts....
    Well I dont know. I find it very hard to be serious on an internet forum ....


    but


    you raise an in interesting point that I have been thinking about lately. Sometimes you have to do stuff when you dont have all the facts, should you let this paralyse you ?
    should you not speak unless you know ALL the background ?


    hic



    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Confused.
    Presumably she took him to the cleaners because his willy smelled like a tuna fish or a haddock or something. If he had sh@gged a bloke it would have smelled like a dog turd. So wouldn't she have taken him to the cleaners anyway ??

    It might have been better all round if he had kept his willie in his undies






    Or if she had taken care of business? Its very hard to tell without knowing all the facts....

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Beefy198 View Post
    My brother committed adultery in his first marriage and she took him to the cleaners. I pointed out that if he had had sex with a bloke he would have, technically, got away with it....

    (If you ignore 'unreasonable behaviour')
    Confused.
    Presumably she took him to the cleaners because his willy smelled like a tuna fish or a haddock or something. If he had sh@gged a bloke it would have smelled like a dog turd. So wouldn't she have taken him to the cleaners anyway ??

    It might have been better all round if he had kept his willie in his undies






    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Beefy198 View Post
    My brother committed adultery in his first marriage and she took him to the cleaners. I pointed out that if he had had sex with a bloke he would have, technically, got away with it....

    (If you ignore 'unreasonable behaviour')
    You know how to cheer you brother up don't you!

    Leave a comment:


  • Beefy198
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    "it is technically only possible to commit adultery within a relationship between two people of opposite sexes"

    I was not aware of that technicality.

    And if my wife was having sex with another woman I would not think adultery - I would think waaahheeyyyy - as long as I can watch....
    My brother committed adultery in his first marriage and she took him to the cleaners. I pointed out that if he had had sex with a bloke he would have, technically, got away with it....

    (If you ignore 'unreasonable behaviour')

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I think we need some urgent genetic engineering to address this injustice.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    "it is technically only possible to commit adultery within a relationship between two people of opposite sexes"

    I was not aware of that technicality.

    And if my wife was having sex with another woman I would not think adultery - I would think waaahheeyyyy - as long as I can watch....

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    started a topic Master of the bleeding obvious.

    Master of the bleeding obvious.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7688970.stm

    Gay unions are statistically less likely to produce children and therefore it is likely that less maintenance orders will be made.
    You don't say!

    ( On an additional note - standard of journalism fewer maintenance orders )

Working...
X