Originally posted by Spacecadet
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Master of the bleeding obvious.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Master of the bleeding obvious."
Collapse
-
Only 99%?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWe should definetly say nothing until ALL facts are known! Thats the end of 99% of posts to cuk then....
are you sure? I think you should go and read through everything ever posted and get your facts straight
Leave a comment:
-
We should definetly say nothing until ALL facts are known! Thats the end of 99% of posts to cuk then....Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostWell I dont know. I find it very hard to be serious on an internet forum ....
but
you raise an in interesting point that I have been thinking about lately. Sometimes you have to do stuff when you dont have all the facts, should you let this paralyse you ?should you not speak unless you know ALL the background ?
hic

Leave a comment:
-
Well I dont know. I find it very hard to be serious on an internet forum ....Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostOr if she had taken care of business? Its very hard to tell without knowing all the facts....
but
you raise an in interesting point that I have been thinking about lately. Sometimes you have to do stuff when you dont have all the facts, should you let this paralyse you ?
should you not speak unless you know ALL the background ?
hic
Leave a comment:
-
Or if she had taken care of business? Its very hard to tell without knowing all the facts....Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostConfused.
Presumably she took him to the cleaners because his willy smelled like a tuna fish or a haddock or something. If he had sh@gged a bloke it would have smelled like a dog turd. So wouldn't she have taken him to the cleaners anyway ??
It might have been better all round if he had kept his willie in his undies

Leave a comment:
-
Confused.Originally posted by Beefy198 View PostMy brother committed adultery in his first marriage and she took him to the cleaners. I pointed out that if he had had sex with a bloke he would have, technically, got away with it....
(If you ignore 'unreasonable behaviour')
Presumably she took him to the cleaners because his willy smelled like a tuna fish or a haddock or something. If he had sh@gged a bloke it would have smelled like a dog turd. So wouldn't she have taken him to the cleaners anyway ??
It might have been better all round if he had kept his willie in his undies
Leave a comment:
-
You know how to cheer you brother up don't you!Originally posted by Beefy198 View PostMy brother committed adultery in his first marriage and she took him to the cleaners. I pointed out that if he had had sex with a bloke he would have, technically, got away with it....
(If you ignore 'unreasonable behaviour')
Leave a comment:
-
My brother committed adultery in his first marriage and she took him to the cleaners. I pointed out that if he had had sex with a bloke he would have, technically, got away with it....Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post"it is technically only possible to commit adultery within a relationship between two people of opposite sexes"
I was not aware of that technicality.
And if my wife was having sex with another woman I would not think adultery - I would think waaahheeyyyy - as long as I can watch....
(If you ignore 'unreasonable behaviour')
Leave a comment:
-
I think we need some urgent genetic engineering to address this injustice.
Leave a comment:
-
"it is technically only possible to commit adultery within a relationship between two people of opposite sexes"
I was not aware of that technicality.
And if my wife was having sex with another woman I would not think adultery - I would think waaahheeyyyy - as long as I can watch....
Leave a comment:
-
Master of the bleeding obvious.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7688970.stm
You don't say!Gay unions are statistically less likely to produce children and therefore it is likely that less maintenance orders will be made.
( On an additional note - standard of journalism
fewer maintenance orders )
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: