• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: bit drastic

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "bit drastic"

Collapse

  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are passing judgement on something you have no idea of. How do you know what the quality of life of these people is?
    I hold an opinion, I'm not passing judgement. I'm not telling anyone they are wrong because their opinion differs from mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    But it wasn't just him. The doctors had to decide to help kill him... normally ending some else's life is not a decision you're allowed to make!
    do you think they offeret it to him before he asked?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View Post
    I think that everybody should be able to make their own decisions.

    He was convinced that this was the best solution.

    We can only hope he had thought it through.
    But it wasn't just him. The doctors had to decide to help kill him... normally ending some else's life is not a decision you're allowed to make!

    Leave a comment:


  • Diestl
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are passing judgement on something you have no idea of. How do you know what the quality of life of these people is?
    It's called imagination, some humans have this ability.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    You are passing judgement on something you have no idea of. How do you know what the quality of life of these people is?
    WHS. And without any reference to pets' names.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Why? Because although it's tragic he is paralysed from the chest down (i.e. he still has use of his arms), it will not result in a deteriation in his quality of life to the point of death being a viable alternative, that's why!!

    Contrast it to the guys and girls returning from afghanistan and iraq minus limbs (in some cases, all their limbs).

    You are passing judgement on something you have no idea of. How do you know what the quality of life of these people is?

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    I think that everybody should be able to make their own decisions.

    He was convinced that this was the best solution.

    We can only hope he had thought it through.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    If I have offended anybody, really, I apologize - always a tricky call this sort of thing.
    I thought you were trolling...

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Having no legs and being in pain is not grounds for euthanasia. Loads of people have chronic pain from spinal problems... I actually think losing your arms would be far worse than legs... just look at the number of sports you can do in a wheelchair.

    As for bowel problems, that's embarrassing but again, not that rare or dehabilitating. And with working arms you can presumably clean yourself which would be dreadful otherwise.

    Nothing to stop you offing yourself, nobody can really stop that, but a doctor shouldn't be sanctioning it for someone with working brain and still mobile.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Whoa whoa whoa there, there is no need for that.
    I know we do cynical mostly in general, but this is a subject that requires more dignity than that.
    If I have offended anybody, really, I apologize - always a tricky call this sort of thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    Why not start to call them by new pet names? e.g. Fido, Rex, Tiddles, etc.? That way, if they end up being nothing more than a head wired up to various machines, you can, without any risk of worrying your conscience, have them put down.
    Whoa whoa whoa there, there is no need for that.
    I know we do cynical mostly in general, but this is a subject that requires more dignity than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBigYinJames
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    I appreciate what you're saying and it's all valid, but, for me, I could not help my kids end their own life simple because of paralysis.
    Even if they begged you? I agree that I would not want to do it, but I couldn't force them to live a life of misery if they really didn't want it and there was no future, and they were begging me to help them. Would you want them to help you to die if you wanted it at the end of your life, or for them to refuse you on the ground they wouldn' like it?

    Saying sall that, in this particular case, partial paralysis doesn't seem enough of a "no future" for me to take this, I'd be very tempted to say to them "wait a year and if you're still that unhappy I'll help you do it" in the hope that if it was just a temporary depression and I could convince them life could still be good in that year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    I appreciate what you're saying and it's all valid, but, for me, I could not help my kids end their own life simple because of paralysis.

    It's an opinion, that's all...
    Why not start to call them by new pet names? e.g. Fido, Rex, Tiddles, etc.? That way, if they end up being nothing more than a head wired up to various machines, you can, without any risk of worrying your conscience, have them put down.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    What if it is what they want? If they do not want the transition?
    You would rather inflict 50 - 60 years of suffering on them?
    You would be happy never to see them again after they turned against you for not helping?
    You would be happy to subject them to a life of horrors that you can not imagine?
    I appreciate what you're saying and it's all valid, but, for me, I could not help my kids end their own life simple because of paralysis.

    It's an opinion, that's all...

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Maybe they might feel different after a while?
    Maybe, but what if they do not?
    I do not expect that this decision was taken lightly.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X