Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
"Many users had come from systems that they felt were far more sophisticated in computer science terms, and were tremendously frustrated by the worse is better design philosophy that they felt Unix and much of its software encapsulated."
Probably the same attitude that led Dijkstra to assert that "Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea which could only have originated in California"
But he's the guy who first argued the harmfulness of GOTO (which was an important point to make in stressing the necessity for structured programming, when programming was still a virtually unknown craft) so I shall continue to define my classes and instantiate my objects, whilst also continuing to explore the writings of such progenitors of the craft of software in the hope that I can keep on getting better at writing it
There is nothing wrong with the use of "goto" in the "right" place!
Why would anyone hate Unix, my Sky box runs the crap
"Many users had come from systems that they felt were far more sophisticated in computer science terms, and were tremendously frustrated by the worse is better design philosophy that they felt Unix and much of its software encapsulated."
Probably the same attitude that led Dijkstra to assert that "Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea which could only have originated in California"
But he's the guy who first argued the harmfulness of GOTO (which was an important point to make in stressing the necessity for structured programming, when programming was still a virtually unknown craft) so I shall continue to define my classes and instantiate my objects, whilst also continuing to explore the writings of such progenitors of the craft of software in the hope that I can keep on getting better at writing it
Bear in mind that this was published in 1994, so much of what it says is about as relevant to modern versions of Unix as criticism of Windows 3.1 is to Vista or XP...
...but it's still a funny book, and there's some good computer science in there
Leave a comment: