• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Let the people decide"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Good to see the majority of intellectuals here can see Man Made Global Warming for the croc it plainly is.

    Still a few sad individuals that believe a completely rebukked and now discredited report written by the goverment nearly 10 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    So the real question is "Has the world gone a bit pear shaped?"

    yeah , good point.
    Anthropogenic Pear-shaped warming, doesn't really have much of a ring about it. Saturn - now thats got a nice ring about it.


    Anthropogenic Oblate-Spheroid Warming - no, just doesn't work for me.




    bored bored bored


    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    I was willing to listen to the evidence, but I have become increasingly sceptical. I now believe that scientists have exploited the situation as a source of grants and governments have jumped on the issue because it is seen being good for their image and an excellent source of revenues.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Oblate spheroid
    Ah, so the earth is simulateously flat and spherical.

    IGMC...

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Heretic! Burn him!
    Well according to the Global Warming evangelists that won't be needed soon, it will happen spontaneously.

    Have you considered the CO2 footprint of burning heretics?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    good point, well made.


    I bet the planets not even a globe anyway, more , pear shaped. or something




    Oblate spheroid

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Needs to be multiple choice poll since there is some truth and carp on all sides IMO.

    My stance basically:
    • Climate change happens, something is always behind the change and man may be it this time
    • The climate would change anyway, one way or another.
    • The models are almost certainly carp and could be completely overturned IMO
    • It's not great science since little effort goes into disproving/discrediting the theory or models. It shares some similarities to a belief system here.
    • There's little or no research done into the real and un-PC causes of and solutions to climate change, i.e. population growth and agriculture
    • All economically obtainable oil will be used regardless
    • Little research is done into the positive affects of warming climate. All is doom and gloom

    Heretic! Burn him!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Needs to be multiple choice poll since there is some truth and carp on all sides IMO.

    My stance basically:
    • Climate change happens, something is always behind the change and man may be it this time
    • The climate would change anyway, one way or another.
    • The models are almost certainly carp and could be completely overturned IMO
    • It's not great science since little effort goes into disproving/discrediting the theory or models. It shares some similarities to a belief system here.
    • There's little or no research done into the real and un-PC causes of and solutions to climate change, i.e. population growth and agriculture
    • All economically obtainable oil will be used regardless
    • Little research is done into the positive affects of warming climate. All is doom and gloom

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by NetworkNinja View Post
    I don't see how you can ever get a non-biased answer to a lot of these problems. Research will always favour one side of the argument and the other side will always have a counter argument as to why that research is invalid. Such is the way of the world. Another prime example would be the MMR / Autism scandal. Who can you trust ??
    The government funded scientists where the conclusion of the report doesn't even stack up over time.

    Leave a comment:


  • NetworkNinja
    replied
    I don't see how you can ever get a non-biased answer to a lot of these problems. Research will always favour one side of the argument and the other side will always have a counter argument as to why that research is invalid. Such is the way of the world. Another prime example would be the MMR / Autism scandal. Who can you trust ??

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    good point, well made.


    I bet the planets not even a globe anyway, more , pear shaped. or something




    So the real question is "Has the world gone a bit pear shaped?"

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Is the planet warming due to human activity?

    Oh, the planet isn't even warming, so that makes the whole argument of whether the climate is warming due to human activity meaningless....
    good point, well made.


    I bet the planets not even a globe anyway, more , pear shaped. or something




    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    What the hell does the A in AGW stand for? I've worked out that G & W are Global and Warming.
    Is the planet warming due to human activity?

    Oh, the planet isn't even warming, so that makes the whole argument of whether the climate is warming due to human activity meaningless....

    Leave a comment:


  • voodooflux
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    Automatic Girth Welder?
    Sounds painful.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    Anthropogenic Global Warming
    Thanks.

    Ok what the fark does Anthropogenic mean? Sod that I'll google the bugger

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X