• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Uber Doomed: typical homeowner is paying £135 more a month for their mortgage"

Collapse

  • Iron Condor
    replied
    Originally posted by robnjc View Post
    Just to make you all really sick, my brother started buying his flat in Coventry in 1983. Its a two-bed ground-floor in a low-rise block in a not brilliant but not awful part of town. Price £13k. I think he's paying less than £60 pcm.
    My brother in law bought a 3 bed terrace house for 24K in wolverhampton in 2001. The same year i bought my house in west london for 260K. I could have bought half his street for that back then.. He sold up in 2006 for 65K. My house in london didnt go up anywhere near that much percentage wise..

    He was paying £130 a month mortgage, and he still thought a mortgage+bills+food+clothes+banger was too much for his minimum wage salary..he has now moved back in with his parents..
    Last edited by Iron Condor; 7 January 2008, 12:36.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    'The cost of the typical home loan has soared to a seven-year high with families facing mortgage bills more than 20 per cent higher than two years ago as the effects of the credit crunch take their toll.

    Bank of England figures show that the typical homeowner is paying £135 more a month for their mortgage than last year, prompting fears of a rise in home repossessions as people struggle to pay debts.'


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../nrates107.xml


    ouch 135 pound more a month than last year, 1500 quid a year not being spent on other things, ouch, feel that economy slow down


    Milan.
    [smug]

    Only if they've got one...

    [smug/]

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    rob why would that story make anyone here sick ?

    is your bro' still in the flat ? if he is I guess he must be feeling sick by now.

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by robnjc View Post
    Just to make you all really sick
    Coventry

    Leave a comment:


  • robnjc
    replied
    Just to make you all really sick, my brother started buying his flat in Coventry in 1983. Its a two-bed ground-floor in a low-rise block in a not brilliant but not awful part of town. Price £13k. I think he's paying less than £60 pcm.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by robnjc View Post
    I'm sure I paid 15%+ in the 80's.

    Of course the problem these days is exacerbated by the high multiples allowed when calculating. I'm sure my first mortgage was based on a max of 2.5x mine + 1x the wife's salary.
    I wish I could buy a house for £60,000

    Leave a comment:


  • robnjc
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    What’s all the fuss about? My mortgage rate was 13% in the early 90's... it's cyclical and will go up as well as down, I didn't see too many stories about how much extra cash people had when it was at a low? If people have been too greedy and overstretched themselves then they only have themselves to blame.

    In real terms almost everything is cheaper than it was 10 years ago yet public opinion says things are more expensive??
    I'm sure I paid 15%+ in the 80's.

    Of course the problem these days is exacerbated by the high multiples allowed when calculating. I'm sure my first mortgage was based on a max of 2.5x mine + 1x the wife's salary.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    What’s all the fuss about? My mortgage rate was 13% in the early 90's... it's cyclical and will go up as well as down, I didn't see too many stories about how much extra cash people had when it was at a low? If people have been too greedy and overstretched themselves then they only have themselves to blame.

    In real terms almost everything is cheaper than it was 10 years ago yet public opinion says things are more expensive??

    Leave a comment:


  • Iron Condor
    replied
    Since when was a 200K mortgage typical?. Maybe for Telegraph readers its typical. Probably only 10% or less of mortgage holders have mortages that big...

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    You might laugh, but with CPI being based on the price of a DVD player imported from China - this too will soon go up!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    It's not the £135/month in isolation, but this combined with double digit % rises in gas, electricity, petrol/diesel, train fares, basic food stuffs, council taxes.

    Bundle this in with rising debt costs and you have a recipe for mass bankruptcy and reposessions.
    Phew! It's a good job that inflation is so low, otherwise things would be bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    But anyhow, the solution is to get into BTL.

    HTH

    Aye. All these repossessed are going to have to move to rental.
    Boomed!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
    Re: the recent thread where a number of people here thought that £1000 a year was not a lot of money.

    It is a lot of money to much of the population. £135/month will hurt many, especially when combined with soaring inflation in energy and foodstuffs.

    It's not the £135/month in isolation, but this combined with double digit % rises in gas, electricity, petrol/diesel, train fares, basic food stuffs, council taxes.

    Bundle this in with rising debt costs and you have a recipe for mass bankruptcy and reposessions.

    But anyhow, the solution is to get into BTL.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    house prices are a matter of opinion - debt is a matter of fact

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Re: the recent thread where a number of people here thought that £1000 a year was not a lot of money.

    It is a lot of money to much of the population. £135/month will hurt many, especially when combined with soaring inflation in energy and foodstuffs.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X