• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Well Britain's Iraq war is ending now. Who won?"

Collapse

  • Mailman
    replied
    Maybe they should have poached the bird eh?

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman View Post
    ...is about as dead as that short fat flightless bird that tasted pretty good! Mailman
    It didn't taste so good apparently:
    They would take a dinner break on the tropical island and consume the defenceless Dodo, but it was clearly an acquired taste as the sailors named it 'valghvogel'- meaning disgusting bird.
    http://www.dodopad.com/dodofact/dodofact.htm

    And was closely related to the pigeon I gather.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Lambros View Post
    back here, it has to be seen as a propaganda victory for an Imperialistic establishment, because they've managed to keep control of the mass media agenda throughout, even through:
    You must live in laalaa land if you believe the government controls the media

    Its a bit like accusing the jews of owning the media, cause if that were true that would be one of the worst purchases ever made in history!

    Anyway, if you despise the imperialists so much (ie. the West) why not move to those socialist utopian socieites like North Korea or Iran or teliban country? Oh thats right, cause then if you dare question anything you will get your head lopped off!

    Face it Lamby, your beloved socialism ideology is about as dead as that short fat flightless bird that tasted pretty good!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The dynamics of the middle east may well have been such that the balance of peace was maintained by bribery corruption and many other forms of diplomacy that you and I would have no knowledge of.
    Come off it, DA - you're an agent. You've plenty of knowledge of bribery, corruption and other forms of diplomacy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    We should have a new tax!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • RandyW
    replied
    I need a poll.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Don't forget the complete detruction of the economy and infrastructure and social services by the US governer of Iraq. This was shock therapy worse than what was done in Russia..and we have seen Russia going back towards the communists recently. The creation of a false democracy in Iraq. It is entirely a puppet regime, with no connection what so ever with the general population - kinda like Egypt.

    This was on a loser from the start. Invaders with a different relegion, no knowledge of the cultures and relegious clashes between sunni and shia. No idea about the long term hatred between clans. Dissafection of the population due the economic "reforms". Zero post-war planning. The Brits should have done better with all our colonial experience.

    'Course back then the natives usually couldn't shoot back...
    I think diserves a new thread. Join me , cos I feel very strongly about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Don't forget the complete detruction of the economy and infrastructure and social services by the US governer of Iraq. This was shock therapy worse than what was done in Russia..and we have seen Russia going back towards the communists recently. The creation of a false democracy in Iraq. It is entirely a puppet regime, with no connection what so ever with the general population - kinda like Egypt.

    This was on a loser from the start. Invaders with a different relegion, no knowledge of the cultures and relegious clashes between sunni and shia. No idea about the long term hatred between clans. Dissafection of the population due the economic "reforms". Zero post-war planning. The Brits should have done better with all our colonial experience.

    'Course back then the natives usually couldn't shoot back...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lambros
    replied
    back here, it has to be seen as a propaganda victory for an Imperialistic establishment, because they've managed to keep control of the mass media agenda throughout, even through:

    two sets of lying and deceiving "Iraq WMD dossiers"
    ALMOST every UK lawyer saying a war would probably be illegal
    shock and awe pictures on every TV showing Baghdad in flames
    highly misleading pictures shoeing the fall of Saddam statue
    the emerging evidence of sexing up intelligence and consequent death of Dr Kelly front-page pictures of UK soldiers urinating on an Iraqi
    the destruction of Fallujah as a 2004 election victory present from Bush
    the facade of fair and democratic elections in Iraq
    getting away with bringing in tough legislation after 7/7 without any media acceptance that this was a direct result of invading Iraq
    AND THIS LIST IS OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD!

    However, it is not an overall victory for an Imperialist establishment, because the antiwar movement is still there, the public are MUCH less likely to believe a word of what the government says, and the 18-24 age range are now so cynical that most are refusing (or can't be bothered) to vote.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    I think todays Panorama gives a good insight into the reality.
    And God help me, I agree with Baggy again. The truth is the truth, after all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Nothing to add then?
    Lots to add, but as you cant force a horse to drink at the water well, well I cant force a fool to read what he doesnt want to read

    Anyways, Dodgy pretty much got it in one.

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I'm not airbrushing out anything. What I am saying is... it is not genuine to retrospectively condemn something you were happily complicit in and then use that as a moral justification for something entirely different. If Saddam were a war criminal then the USA government et al should have been tried as accessories
    The difference is that you are applying the laws of hindsight very selectivly. The dynamics of the middle east may well have been such that the balance of peace was maintained by bribery corruption and many other forms of diplomacy that you and I would have no knowledge of. The fact that it ended up with a war may have been because the "peaceful" initiatives were no longer viable.

    To crudely cherry pick on the USA when there were and are many awkward b**tards out there with considerable personal agendas with no accountability to democratic processes, and with so much wealth at stake is not exactly giving any balance to what has happened in the middle east.

    The uSA is such an easy target for the cowards who dare not criticise some of the totalitarian regimes out there. And whilst the USA may be culpable in many ways only a fool or a guilt ridden idiot with their own personal agenda, would lay more than some of the blame on their doorstep.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman View Post
    Again you completely airbrush out the political context of the middle east in your little hate'n rant of Uncle Sam.

    Mailman
    Nothing to add then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I'm not airbrushing out anything. What I am saying is... it is not genuine to retrospectively condemn something you were happily complicit in and then use that as a moral justification for something entirely different. If Saddam were a war criminal then the USA government et al should have been tried as accessories
    Again you completely airbrush out the political context of the middle east in your little hate'n rant of Uncle Sam.

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I'm not airbrushing out anything. What I am saying is... it is not genuine to retrospectively condemn something you were happily complicit in and then use that as a moral justification for something entirely different. If Saddam were a war criminal then the USA government et al should have been tried as accessories
    He was hung because of those WMDs, which are still hidden but we'll find them.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X