Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
You have to be authoritative with babies, you know? Now they look sweet and fluffy, after a few years they are ready to knock you down and take your car keys if you don't set them straight when they are still young.
Being a contractor I am of course a master dealsmith, but aside from that:
my landlord is a big, mainly commercial property investment company that's owned the block for at least 10 years, and has bigger fish to fry than to rent-review every tinpot 1-bedder every year, even if it is in SW1 (and none of your -V or -P neither)
Well, the proportion between renting and buying is not a linear one. As the property is of much bigger value then the rent is proportionally lower. I was just surprised that you can rent a near 400k house for only 200pw. That would give you a studio flat in London whose value is less. However, I do understand that outside London rents are much cheaper so in this case it might be an appropriate market value. It all depends on location, location, location, you know.
Or maybe I missed your point, and you have knowledge of the rental market in that area for that type of property.
Well, the proportion between renting and buying is not a linear one. As the property is of much bigger value then the rent is proportionally lower. I was just surprised that you can rent a near 400k house for only 200pw. That would give you a studio flat in London whose value is less. However, I do understand that outside London rents are much cheaper so in this case it might be an appropriate market value. It all depends on location, location, location, you know.
FFS! Renting is dead dollars. And, as a previously long-term renter, I can say, without fear of contradiction, that all BTL landlords are numpty tw@ts, bumrags, tramp's foreskin knob cheese, and foul-smelling dog eggs. Never, never would I want to assist such a greedy, evil, corrupt sh1thouse bog scraping pay off their mortgage again. The lice.
That sounds like you are not paying your fair share of rent. I'd say the rent in that price range being more like 300 pw. However, still your considerations apply, although to a less degree.
Eh? Fair share? Just because the apartment has doubled in price or something since it last changed hands?
The whole issue at the moment is that renting at current prices can be cheaper than buying at current prices, simply because so many people have property available to let. Rental prices are also governed by supply and demand - but they are not necessarily shackled to property prices! It would be ridiculous to assume that just because a landlord pays £x mortgage a month, he should make the rent equal at least £x. Yes, it's nice if he can (i.e. if the local market allows) but 'fairness' doesn't come into it.
Or maybe I missed your point, and you have knowledge of the rental market in that area for that type of property.
The flat I'm renting for £200/wk is valued at £375,000
If I was going to buy it I'd have to put down £75k deposit, get a 6% mortgage of three times my rent, and pay it for 20 years.
If I was only prepared to pay the same £200/wk, it would never get paid off because the outstanding interest would keep getting bigger.
How is that right?
That sounds like you are not paying your fair share of rent. I'd say the rent in that price range being more like 300 pw. However, still your considerations apply, although to a less degree.
Leave a comment: