Originally posted by LondonManc
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Computer security course tutor...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Computer security course tutor..."
Collapse
-
Exactly.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNope cos he does business with them...
Leave a comment:
-
Nope cos he does business with them...Originally posted by LondonManc View PostIf he extended his travel ban to Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt and Cuba, he'd be far more likely to stop terrorists given the country of origin of US terrorists in the past four decades.
Leave a comment:
-
If he extended his travel ban to Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt and Cuba, he'd be far more likely to stop terrorists given the country of origin of US terrorists in the past four decades.Originally posted by barrydidit View PostTrump's wall will sort that crazy tulip out in no time.
Leave a comment:
-
Trump's wall will sort that crazy tulip out in no time.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostShows how daft the visa application is.
Are you a terrorist?
No
Come in then.

Leave a comment:
-
Shows how daft the visa application is.
Are you a terrorist?
No
Come in then.
Leave a comment:
-
It does say on the note on page one of the PDFOriginally posted by zeitghost View Post
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOUR...cr-10057-0.pdf
Feck me, looks like the scrote went all the way to the Supreme Court:
FindACase™ | Oyegoke-Eniola v. United States
1Defendant undoubtedly will appeal this order and anyone reading
it should be aware that defendant has a bachelor’s degree in computer
engineering and an MBA. He is not the typical unschooled pro se
litigant.
Leave a comment:
-
UNITED STATES v. OYEGOKE ENIOLA | FindLaw

You can take the guy out of the 419, but you can't take the 419 out of the guy.After Defendant pleaded guilty, the probation office prepared a PSR.
Unchallenged portions of the PSR set forth the following: Defendant is a citizen of Nigeria who had resided in Great Britain before coming to this country.
In Great Britain he had been convicted of several felonies involving fraud and deception.
He entered the United States in 2009 on a visa by falsely stating in his visa application that he had not been convicted of a crime.
In 2011 he submitted an application for status as a permanent resident, again falsely answering that he had no criminal convictions.
The 2011 false statement was the basis for his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1546. Defendant's mail-fraud conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 was based on his use of the mails to engage in an identity-theft scheme.
He would purchase merchandise with credit cards issued to other persons and have the merchandise delivered to him.

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/ka...on-county-bank
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOUR...cr-10057-0.pdfEni Oyegoke-Eniola, 33, a citizen of Nigeria who has been residing in Kechi, Kansas, is charged with one count of making a false statement to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, two counts of wire fraud, two counts of mail fraud, and two counts of aggravated identity theft. The crimes are alleged to have been committed in February and March 2011.
The indictment alleges Eniola unlawfully withheld information about his prior felony convictions in Great Britain. He also alleges he used another person’s identity to order and pay for gold coins.
If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison and a fine up to $250,000 on the false statement charge; a maximum penalty of 20 years and a fine up to $250,000 on each of the mail fraud and wire fraud counts; and a mandatory two years consecutive to other sentences and a fine up to $250,000 on the aggravated identity theft charge. The U.S. Secret Service investigated. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alan Metzger is prosecuting.
Feck me, looks like the scrote went all the way to the Supreme Court:
http://ky.findacase.com/research/wfr...406.SCT.htm/qxLast edited by zeitghost; 1 March 2017, 15:06.
Leave a comment:
-
Computer security course tutor...
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: